پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 937 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,696 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,616,328 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,980,696 |
آموزش شبکه های فعلی زبان فارسی: مقایسة عملکرد فارسی آموزان غیرایرانی در پاسخگویی به پرسشهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 91، دوره 10، شماره 26، خرداد 1397، صفحه 139-163 اصل مقاله (944.2 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2017.11389.1176 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| امیررضا وکیلی فرد* 1؛ رویا جدیری جمشیدی2؛ احمد صفارمقدم3 | ||
| 1دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره) | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان | ||
| 3پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و علوم انسانی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در پژوهش حاضر تأثیر آموزش مستقیم شبکه های فعلی زبان فارسی بر میزان پاسخگویی زبانآموزان به پرسشهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. پژوهشگران، ابتدا یک گروه از فارسیآموزان غیرایرانی در سطح پیشرفته را به صورت تصادفی انتخاب کردند. با برگزاری پیشآزمون، زبانآموزانی را از میان آنها برگزیدند که از دانشِ واژگانی غنیتری برخوردار بودند. پس از تهیة 3 درس که هر یک دارای 27 شبکة فعلی پربسامد زبان فارسی بود و آموزش آنها به روش مستقیم (آشکار) بود. در پایان هر درس یک پسآزمون (در مجموع سه پسآزمون) شامل پرسشهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی اجرا گردید. درسها به گونه ای طراحی شده بودند که فعلها به شکل خوشهای یا شبکه ای تدریس گردد و مدرس زبان فارسی برای هر شبکة فعلی زمان لازم را صرف نماید. پس از برگزاری آزمونها، نمرههای زبانآموزان در دو بخش پرسشهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی با روشهای آماری تحلیل شد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد زبانآموزان توانسته بودند به کمک آموزش مستقیم شبکه های فعلی زبان فارسی به پرسشهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی پاسخ دهند. همچنین یافته های مقایسۀ پارامترها، اختلاف معناداری را بین میانگین آزمونهای استنتاجی و جایگزینی نشان نداد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| واژههای کلیدی: شبکة واژگانی؛ شبکۀ فعلی؛ آموزش مستقیم؛ پرسشهای استنتاجی؛ پرسشهای واژگانی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Teaching Persian Verbal Networks to Non- Iranian Learners: A Comparison of their Performance in Answering to the Alternative and Inclusive Questions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amir Reza Vakilifard1؛ Roya Jediri Jamshidi2؛ Aahmad Safar Moghadam3 | ||
| 1Imam Khomeini International University | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان | ||
| 3Institute of Culture and Human Sciences | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| 1. Introduction The present study explores the direct effects of teaching Persian lexical network on the level of foreign Persian language learners with respect to inferential and substitution questions. Raghibdoost and Jamshidi (2012) state that direct teaching of lexical network significantly improves the learning ability of foreign Persian language learners. Moreover, adaptation of inferential and substitution questions in task-based modules has enabled the authors of the current research to develop the present study based on the learners’ responses. When learners read a word, an image is stored in their sensory memory which is then transferred to short-term memory (where one’s current and temporary memories are stored) to be retrieved immediately in the cases of emergency. In other words, short-term memory serves as the information storage while functioning verbal tasks. It is, therefore, known as functional memory also. To identify and find the meaning of a word or a term, one searches the short-memory, and if needed, it can be transferred and stored in the long-term memory (Filed, 2002:19). The word information shall then be retrieved from long-term memory. When learners store a word in their short-term memory, they would only be familiar with its image and answer substitution questions. However, according to psychologists’ findings and reports, if the appropriate teaching method is applied, the learners transfer the acquired data into their long-term memory. Thus, when learners search for the answer of a question, they come across a network of related words and can easily answer inferential questions. 2. Objectives of the study The present study attempts to investigate the impact of explicit teaching of Persian verbal networks on the responses learners provide to the inferential and substitution questions. It seeks to show how learning lexical network contributes to better answering the inferential and substitution questions, as well as identifying the questions that are attempted most frequently. 3. Methodology The present study adopts an experimental and comparative approach. First, a preliminary test was given and administered to select learners who were more familiar with lexical networks. It is worth noting that the principles of task-based teaching were used to design the modules of this research. The study focuses more on reading skill but also contains listening, speaking and, writing skills to provide for parallel development of all skills. Each of the three modules taught consists of 27 verbal networks which amounts to 107 verbs overall including their subsection. At the end of the teaching session, exam questions were given into two categories of ‘inferential (in the form of True or False)’ and ‘substitution (substituting verbs in the same network)’. Learners’ answers were analyzed and compared using SPSS software. Inferential questions: Based on the syllabus covered in each module, and the hope for measuring learners’ ability to identify synonymous words, five True/False questions were given. The applicants were required to refer to their memory to provide the correct answer. Substitution questions: In this part, initially, six verbs presented in the module were given as choices in five questions eliminating the verb in each question. The applicants were asked to substitute the correct verb for each question. It is worth noting that in designing post-test questions, transitive, intransitive, and linking verbs were used and the instructor implicitly emphasized the substitution principles. 4. Research Findings Post-test results were analyzed to measure the difference in the performance of applicants in answering inferential or substitution questions. The obtained mean of inferential questions (10.20) was higher than that of substitution questions (9.73; SD= 2.98). However, the results of t-test (P>0.05, 0.73=14) and the effect size indicator (R=0.19) showed no significant difference between the means of inferential and substitution questions. 5. Conclusion The present study suggests innovative ways of teaching lexical network and the use of connections between verbs in teaching Persian. The findings show that all learners were keen on benefiting from this semantic network of verbs. They, even, requested the researchers for the design of a dictionary for this purpose. Learners of the experimental group stated that attending classes helped them improve their knowledge of Persian. It can, therefore, be concluded that compiling Persian lexical network is of crucial importance to helping foreign Persian language learners. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Key words: lexical network, verbal network, explicit teaching, inferential questions, alternative questions | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
تاج الدین، ضیا (1382). خواندن سطح متوسط/ سطح پیشرفته. تهران: انتشارات کانون زبان ایران. رقیبدوست، شهلا، جمشیدی، رویا (1391). تأثیر آموزش شبکههای واژگانی بر درک مطلب فارسیآموزان غیرایرانی. پژوهشنامۀ آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 1 (2) ص 161-135 صفوی، کورش (1387). درآمدی بر معنیشناسی، تهران: انتشارات سوره مهر. کروز د. ا. (1384). معنیشناسی، مترجم کورش صفوی. تهران: انتشارات سعاد.
1. Tajaddin, Zia (2003). Intermediate/advanced Reading. Tehran: Iran Language Institute Publications. 2. Raghibdoost, Shahla; Jamshidi, Roya (2012). The Effects of Teaching Lexical Networks on the Reading Comprehension of Foreign Persian Language Learners. Journal of Persian Language Teaching to Foreign Learners. Vol. 1 (2). Pp. 135-161. 3. Safavi, Koroush (2008). An Introduction to Semantics. Tehran: Soureh Mehr. 4. Cruse, D A. Lexical Semantics. Trans. Safavi, Koroush (2005). Tehran: Sa’ad Publications.
Reference: Anderson, Neil J. (2006). ACTIVE Skills for Reading. Heinle ELT; 2nd edition. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). The Study of Time Talk in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Language Learning Research Club, Michigan: Michigan University Press. Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1972). How to make a language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (eds), Organization of memory (pp. 309-351). New York: Academic Press ___ (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247. ___ (1970). Does category size affect categorization time? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 432-438. Field, J. (2003). Psycholinguistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. Hulstijn, J. H. 1992. Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning in P. J. Arnaud and H. Bejoint (eds): Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. (pp. 113-25), London: Macmillan. Kinght, S. (1994). Dictionary: The tool of last resort in foreign language reading? A new perspective. Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-99. Laufer, B and Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: the construct of task-induced involvement. Journal of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 22(1), 1-26. Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy . Journal of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 22(2), 241-256. Luppescu, S. and R. R. Day. (1993). Reading, dictionaries and vocabulary learning. Language Learning 43, 263-87. Pulido, D. (2007). The Effects of Topic Familiarity and Passage Sight Vocabulary on L2 Lexical Inferencing and Retention through Reading. Applied Linguistics, 28 (1), 66-86. Schur, E. (2007). Insights into the structure of L1 and L2 vocabulary networks: Intimations of small worlds. In H. Daller, J. Milton and J. Treffers-Daller (eds) Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge (pp. 182-203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 588 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 406 |
||
