پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 911 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,491 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,126,913 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,579,563 |
بررسی متون توصیه ای در گفتمان پزشکی فارسی | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 32، آذر 1398، صفحه 127-158 اصل مقاله (835.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2018.17907.1449 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| صدیقه زینلی دستوئی1؛ عباسعلی آهنگر* 1؛ پاکزاد یوسفیان2؛ استفن لوینسون3 | ||
| 1گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران | ||
| 2گروه زبان انگلیسی- دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی- دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران | ||
| 3SIL International | ||
| چکیده | ||
| توصیه های پزشکی فارسی، به عنوان یکی از حوزه های گفتمان غیرروایی، تاکنون مورد توجه پژوهشگران قرار نگرفته اند. از این رو، پژوهش حاضر به بررسی و مقایسة کاربرد ابزارهای «پیش فرض»، «تقویت» و «تضعیف»توصیه با درنظر گرفتن شدت نسبی این ابزارها در کتابهای نسخهنویسی پزشکی فارسی و مجلههای برخط پزشکی فارسی میپردازد. به این منظور از الگوی لوینسون (Levinsohn, 2015) در بررسی متون غیرروایی بهره گرفته شدهاست. داده های پژوهش، از 100 متن کتابهای نسخهنویسی پزشکی فارسی و 100 متن مجلههای برخط پزشکی فارسی گردآوری و گزینش شدند. همچنین نرم افزار آماری اس. پی. اس. اس برای تحلیل داده ها به کار برده شد. بر پایة یافتههای پژوهش، نتایجی به دست آمد. نخست اینکه، «دستورالعملهای بدون فعل» و «صورتهای امری» از ابزارهای پیش فرض بودند. همچنین «باید» و «بهتر است» به ترتیب در میان صورتهای «تقویت» و «تضعیف» توصیه در کتابهای نسخه نویسی پزشکی فارسی و مجلات برخط پزشکی فارسی به شمار میآیند. دوم اینکه، با توجه به توزیع ابزارهای «پیش فرض»، صورتهای «تقویت» و «تضعیف» توصیه در دو پیکره پژوهش تفاوت معناداری مشاهده گردید. در نهایت، عواملی مانند «برتری دانش پزشک»، «نوع متون توصیه» و «جایگاه توصیه ها در متن» بر انتخاب نوع توصیه ها در متون پزشکی فارسی تاثیرگذار است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| متون توصیه؛ ابزارهای پیشفرض؛ تقویت؛ تضعیف؛ کتابهای نسخهنویسی پزشکی فارسی؛ مجلات برخط پزشکی؛ تحلیل گفتمان پزشکی؛ الگوی لوینسون | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Investigation of the Hortatory Texts in Persian Medical Discourse | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seddigheh Zeynali Dastuyi1؛ Abbas Ali Ahangar1؛ pakzad Yousefiyan2؛ .Stephen H Levinsohn3 | ||
| 1Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Sistan and Baluchestan | ||
| 2English Department- Faculty of Literature and Humanities -University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran | ||
| 3SIL International | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Longacre (1996) recognizes four major discourse genres including narrative, procedural, behavioral and expository discourse. He considers exhortations to be a sub-branch of behavioral discourse, which “deals with how people did or should behave” (Longacre 1996, p. 9, in Dooley & Levinsohn, 2000). Accordingly, this study is going to analyze Persian hortatory texts of two genres: Persian General Practitioners’ Books (GPBs) and Online Medical Journals (OMJs). In particular, it looks at the relative potency of different forms of exhortation and distinguishes between default, highlighted and backgrounded hortatory forms based on Levinsohn (2015). The corpora of this study consisted of 100 texts from two written Persian GPBs and 100 texts from two Persian OMJs. The addressees of the GPBs were general practitioners and students of medical sciences, though writers sometimes directed their exhortations to patients. The addressees of OMJs were the public with some medical knowledge. Our initial step to conduct this research was to classify each sentence as an exhortation or setting it aside as a supportive material; then, 2) listing the different hortatory devices used; 3) counting the frequency of each one; 4) then deciding: a) which one was default, and b) whether using the others had the effect of highlighting or backgrounding the exhortations concerned; and 5) analyzing the statistical significance of the findings through the use of SPSS software version 24. Results of the research indicated that the default devices and the most frequent hortatory devices used in GPBs were “verbless commands” (in the prescription sections of the GPB texts) and “imperatives” (in non-prescription parts of GPBs). Highlighted forms of exhortations found were “must” and “it is necessary” in GPBs. Backgrounded forms of exhortations in GPBs included “it is better”, “it is recommended” and “indirect exhortations”. Example 1, 2 and 3 show the use of the default (verbless command), highlighted (bαyæd “must”) and backgrounded hortatory forms (it is better) in GPBs: 1) bQrAj-e control-e tQngi-j-e nQfQs for controling-EZ tightness-EP-EZ breath “For controlling shortness of breath” - Inhaler salbutamol N=1 2 puffs if necessary - Inhaler beclomethasone N=1 2 puffs every 6 hours (Attar, 2016, p. 191, Bronchiectasis, PFP) 2) kæpsul-e /αmperαzol-rα bαyæd betorekαmel væ qæbl capsule Omeprazole-OM must completely and before /æz qæzα mæsræf nemud /æz ʤævidæn væ from food consumption do.PAST.3SG from chewing and bαz kærd-æn-e kæpsul bαjæd /eʤtenαb open do.PAST-INF-EZ capsule must avoidance Sæv-æd SUBJ.become.PRES-3SG “Omeprazole capsule must be consumed fully before eating food. Chewing and opening the capsule must be avoided.” (Ayati Firoozabadi and Fallah, 2015: 17, Tennis elbow, DPG) 3) behtær /æst ʤæhæt-e tæzriq-e /epinefrin /æz better be.PRES.3SG for-EZ injection-EZ epinephrine from soræng-e /ænsolin /estefαde Sæv-æd syringe-EZ insulin use SUBJ.become.PRES-3SG - “It is better to use Insulin Syringes for injecting Epinephrine.” (Ayati Firoozabadi & Fallah, 2015. p. 99, Anaphylaxis, DPG) The default device in OMJs was “imperative”. Highlighted hortatory forms found in OMJs were “must” and “it is necessary”, “imperatives used with immediately” and “it is highly recommended” were used, as well. Backgrounded hortatory forms in OMJs included “it is better”, “it is recommended” and “indirect exhortations”, “imperatives directed to 1st person plural”, “(it) is helpful”, “infinitives” and “very indirect exhortations”. Example 4, 5 and 6 illustrate the use of the default (imperatives), highlighted (hætmæn “must”) and backgrounded hortatory forms (infinitive): 4) dær suræt-e dαSt-æn-e sαbeqe-j-e bimαri-j-e in form-EZ have.PAST-INF-EZ preexistence-EP-EZ disease-EP-EZ xαs jα mæsræf-e dαru be pezeSk-e-tαn special or consumption-EZ drug to physician-EZ-CLIT.3PL /etelα/ dæh-id information IMPER.give.PRES-2PL “If you have a special disease or consume some drugs, inform your physician.” (Angiography of coronary vessels, DWB, http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=31745) 5) dær suræt-i ke sαbeqe-j-e bimαri-hα-j-e in form-INDEF that preexistence-EP-EZ disease-PL-EP-EZ /en/eqαdi-j-e xun-i dαr-id hætmæn pezeSk-rα coagulation-EP-EZ blood-INDEF have.PRES-2PL must physician-OM motæle/ sαz-id informed IMPER.do.PRES-2PL “If you have the pre-existence of blood coagulation, you must inform your physician.” (Angiography of coronary vessels, DWB, http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=31745) 6) kαheS-e mæsræf-e qæzα-hα-j-e hejvαn-i decreasing-EZ consumption-EZ food-PL-EP-EZ animal-ATTR bexosus guSt-e qermez specially meat-EZ red “Decreasing the consumption of animal foods especially red meat.” (Prevention from breast cancer, DWB) Chi-square test results of the study confirmed significant differences between the application of the default, highlighted and backgrounded hortatory forms used in GPBs and OMJs. In addition, the results confirmed that the factors mentioned by Levinsohn (2015) affected the choice of hortatory forms in GPBs and OMJs; in this regard, the findings demonstrated that the “physician’s superior knowledge”, “the type of the hortatory texts”, “the position of the exhortations in the text”, “the degree of prominence each exhortation is to receive”, and “its scope” all influenced the form of exhortations chosen by the writers of GPBs and OMJs. Our study, further, reached some results contradictory with the ones obtained by Levinsohn (2015) which may be related to language- and culture-specificity and different discourse types studied by the authors of these studies: using “it is necessary” as a highlighted form of exhortation, not a backgrounding one as mentioned by Levinsohn (2015); using “imperatives” directed to 3rd person with equal potency of “imperatives” directed to second person, despite the assertion stated by Levinsohn (2015) where he claims that “imperatives” directed to second person are more potent than “imperatives” directed to 3rd person; and finally, revealing a different result in Persian medical texts from that of Levinsohn (2015) regarding the arrangement of highlighted forms of exhortations and backgrounded ones. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Exhortation devices, Persian general practitioners’ prescription books, Online medical journals, Medical discourse, Levinsohn’s model | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
آیتی فیروزآبادی، محمد، فلاح، فلورا (1394). راهنمای تجویز دارو (برای پزشکان عمومی). تهران: اندیشه رفیع. پرشک آنلاین (1395). دانستنیهای دهان و دندان برای همه. 22 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/15232/> پزشک آنلاین. (1395). پیشگیری از سرطان سینه. 29 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/15232/> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). آنژیوگرافی عروق کرونری. 18 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=31745>> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). پیشگیری از آنفلوآنزا. 25 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=85067> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). توصیههایی برای حفظ سلامتی در هوای گرم. 19 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=28121> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). روشهای پیشگیری از خفگی نوزاد. 30 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=86919> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). لارنژیت حاد. 23 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=30017> پزشکان بدون مرز (1395). موارد منع مصرف ژلوفن. 18 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=86894> چوبساز، یاسمن (1390). بررسی الگوهای گفتمانی در تعامل بین پزشک و بیمار. پایاننامة کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه. دهخدا، علی اکبر (1385). لغتنامه. ج1. چ1. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. سلمانیان، بهار، زینب محمدابراهیمی، بلقیس روشن و فرهنگ بابامحمودی (1394). «خودمحوری گفتار پزشکان و نقش جنسیت در مکالمه پزشک و بیمار». جستارهای زبانی. دورة 6. شمارة 2. صص 129-150. عطار، فرید (1395). نسخهنویسی برای پزشکان. تهران: آناطب. فخرالدینی، مهرداد (1395). آموزش روشهای پیشگیری از بیماریهای قلبی. 30 اردیبهشت 1395.:[Online] <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/8301/> کمری، الهه. (1396). «رشد پیوستگی علّی در گفتمان روایتی کودکان تکزبانۀ فارسیزبان». زبانپژوهی. دورة 11. شمارة 31. صص 151-175. ناصح، محمدامین و استادزاده، زهرا (1389). «تحلیل زبانی-اجتماعی گفتمان پزشک و بیمارفارسی زبان». زبانشناسی و گویشهای خراسان. شماره 2. صص 139-153. نقرهکار، علی (1395). مواردی که قبل از سلول درمانی باید رعایت کرد. 20 اردیبهشت 1395. :[Online] <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/18937/> References
Attar, F. (2016). Prescription for Physicians. Tehran: Anateb [In Persian].
Ayati Firoozabadi, M. & Fallah, F. (2015). Drug Prescription Guide (for General Practitioners). Tehran: Andisheye Rafi [In Persian].
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In M. Bakhtin(Ed.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breeze, M. (1992). Hortatory discourse in Ephesians. Journal of Translation and Textlinguistics, 5(4), 313-47.
Chubsaz, Y. (2011). The investigation of discourse patterns in the interaction between physician and patient (Master’s thesis). Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran [In Persian].
Dehkhoda, A. A. (2006). Dictionary. Tehran: Tehran University Press [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Acute laryngitis. May 12, 2016 [Online]: http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=30017> [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Angiography of coronary vessels. May 7, 2016 [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=31745> [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Contraindications of Gelofen. May 7, 2016 [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=86894> [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Prevention from choking the baby. May 19, 2016, [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=86919> [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Prevention from Flue. May 14, 2016, [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=85067> [In Persian].
Doctors Without Borders (2016). Some recommendations for keeping the health in the hot weather. May 18, 2016, [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=28121> [In Persian].
Dooley, R. A., & Levinsohn, S. H. (2000). Analyzing discourse: a manual of basic concepts. USA: SIL International and University of North Dakota.
Eggins, S., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 230-56). London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Fakhr Aldini, M. (2016). Instructions for prevention from heart diseases. May 19, 2016. [Online]: <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/8301/> [In Persian].
Kamari, E. (2018). Development of causal coherence in the narrative discourse of monolingual Persian-speaking children. Zabanpazhuhi, 11(31), 151-175 [In Persian].
Kompaoré, A., & Garber, E. (2004). Discourse analysis of directive texts: the case of Biblical law (Master’s thesis). Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary, Elkhart Indiana, USA.
Levinsohn, S. H. (2015). Self-instruction materials on non-narrative discourse analysis. USA: SIL International.
Longacre, R. E. (1996). The grammar of discourse (2nd ed). New York: Plenum.
Murcia-Bielsa, S. (1999). Instructional texts in English and Spanish: a contrastive study (PhD Thesis). University of Cordoba, Faculty of Philosophy and Literature, Spain.
Murcia-Bielsa, S. (2000). The choice of directive expressions in English and Spanish instructions: a semantic network. Language in Performance, 117-146.
Naseh, M. A., & Ostadzade, Z. (2010). The socio-linguistic analysis of the discourse between Persian physicians and patients. Linguistics and Dialects of Khorasan, 2, 139-153 [In Persian].
Noghrekar, A. (2016). Cases that must be observed before the cell therapy. May 9, 2016 [Online]: <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/18937/> [In Persian].
Online’s Medic (2016). Learnable issues about the mouth and the teeth for all. May 11, 2016 [Online]: <http://www.pezeshkonline.ir/articles/15232/> [In Persian].
Online’s Medic (2016). Prevention from breast cancer. May 18, 2016, [Online]: <http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=86035> [In Persian].
Ramezani Sarbandi, F., Taki, G., Yousefian, P., & Farangi, M. R. (2017). The effect of physicians’ gender and experience on Persian medical interactions. Discourse and Interaction, 10(1), 89-110.
Salmaniyan, B., Ebrahimi, Z., Roshan, B., & Babamahmudi, F. (2015). Presumptuousness discourse of physicians and gender role in the interaction of physicians and patients. Linguistic Inquiries, 2, 129-150 [In Persian].
Stiles William, B. (1992). Describing talk: a taxonomy of verbal response modes. Newbury Park: Sage.
Wendland, E. R. (2000). Stand fast in the true grace of God! a study of 1 Peter. Journal of Translation and Textlinguistics, 13, 25-102.
Woods, N. (2006). Describing discourse. London: Hodder Arnold. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 697 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 299 |
||
