تطابق فناوری‌های وب 2 با طبقه‌بندی بازنگری شده بلوم و الگوی طراحی آموزشی 5E در آموزش

Açish, S. (2010). an evaluation of activities designed in accordance with the 5Emodel by would-be science teachers. Retrieved January 2012 from http://www. Sciencedirect. Com.

Anderson, L. W., D. R. Krathwohl and B. S. Bloom. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, complete ed., edited by Lorin W. Anderson and David R. Krathwohl. New York: Longman.

Beck, D., & Eno, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy: A literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 70-94.

Boddy, N.; Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five e’s: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33: 27-42.

Callaghan, N., and M. Bower. (2012). “Learning through Social Networking Sites—The Critical Role of the Teacher.” Educational Media International 49, no. 1: 1 –17.

Cheragh molaei, l., kadivar, p, and zarami, gh (2015). Using virtual social network in education: challenges and profit. New approaches educational, (10)3, 29-51, doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2015.375

Creswell, j.h. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Translated: Hassan danaie fard. Tehran: saffar publication. [In pearsian].

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

Doolittle, P. E., and D. Hicks. (2003). “Constructivism as a Theoretical Foundation for the Use of Technology in Social Studies.” Theory & Research in Social Education 31, no. 1: 71–103.

Eber, P. A., and T. S. Parker. (2011). “Assessing Student Learning: Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy.” Human Service Education 27, no. 1: 45–53.

Fardanesh. H. (2008). Theoretical Foundations of Educational Technology. Tehran: samt [in Persian].

Friedman, A. M., & Hicks, D. (2006). Guest editorial: The state of the field: Technology, social studies, and teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 246-258.

Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 24; 21(1).

Haidari, H. (2004). Effect of both traditional and 5e methods on students' academic achievement. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University. [in pearsian]

Halawi, L. A., R. V. McCarthy, and S. Pires. (2009). “An Evaluation of E-Learning on the Basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Education for Business 84, no. 6: 374–80.

Heafner, T. L., and A. M. Friedman. (2008). “Wikis and Constructivism in Secondary Social Studies: Fostering a Deeper Understanding.” Computers in the Schools 25, no. ¾: 288–302.

Hirumi, A. (2013).Grounding e-Learning Interactions to facilitate Critical Thinking & Problem Solving. ASTD Annual Conference Dallas, Texas May 19-22.

Holcomb, L. B., and C. M. Beal. (2011). “Capitalizing on Web 2.0 in the Social Studies Context.” TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 54, no. 4: 28–33.

Holcomb, L. B., C. Beal, and A. Robertson. (2009). “Using Web 2.0 to Support Learning in the Social Studies Context.” Social Studies Research & Practice 4, no. 3: 44 55.

Holcomb, L., C. Beal, and J. K. Lee. (2011). “Supersizing Social Studies through the Use of Web 2.0 Technologies.” Social Studies Research & Practice 6, no. 3: 102 11.

Jideani, V. A., and I. A. Jideani. (2012). “Alignment of Assessment Objectives with Instructional Objectives Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy— The Case for Food Science and Technology Education.” Journal of Food Science Education 11, no. 3: 34–42.

Karami, m; fardanesh, h. and abbaspoor, a. (2008). Comparison of the effectiveness of educational and constructive educational design patterns in the training of managers. Journal of Urban management and planning. 2 (3) .9-30 [in pearsian]

Kaveevivitchai, C. (2008). Enhancing nursing students’ skills in vital signs assessment by using multimedia computer-assisted learning with integrated content of anatomy and Physiology. Retrieved January 2012 from http:// www.sciencedirect.com.

King, R. (2011). “Metacognition: Information Literacy and Web 2.0 as an Instructional Tool.” Currents in Teaching and Learning, 11, no. 2: 22–32.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41, no. 4: 212.

Martorella, P. H. (1997). “Technology and Social Studies or which way to the sleeping giant.” Theory & Research in Social Education 24, no. 4: 511–14.

Okello-Obura, C., & Ssekitto, F. (2015). Web 2.0 technologies application in teaching and learning by Makerere University academic staff.

Razavi. A. (2011). New topics in teaching technology. Ahvaz: shahid Chamran University [in Persian].

Roberts, S. L., and B. M. Butler. (2014). “Consumers and Producers in the Social Studies Classroom: How Web 2.0 Technology Can Break the Cycle of “‘Teachers and Machines.’” In Digital Social Studies, edited by W. Russel, 147–66. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing,

Scheuerell, S. (2010). “Virtual Warrensburg: Using Cooperative Learning and the Internet in the Social Studies Classroom.” Social Studies 101, no. 5: 194–99.

Sugrue, B. (2002). “Problems with Bloom’s Taxonomy.” Performance Express December.

Tyagi, K. & Verma, I. (2013). Influence of Constructivism in Teaching on Academic Achievement of Primary Students. Journal of Education & Research for Sustainable Development (JERSD). 1 (1).

VanFossen, P. J. (2001). “Degree of Internet/WWW Use and Barriers to Use among Secondary Social Studies Teachers.” International Journal of Instructional Media 28, no. 1: 57–74.

Wheeler, S. (2012). “Bloom and Bust.” Learning with Es. June 22, 2012. http:// steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/2012/06/bloom-and-bust.html.

Wilson, E. K., Wright, V. H., Inman, C. T., & Matherson, L. H. (2011). Retooling the social studies classroom for the current generation. The Social Studies, 102(2), 65-72.