پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 938 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,724 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,661,335 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,016,410 |
مطالعه ی راهبردهای حفظی، یادافزا و متنی و بررسی اثرات این راهبردها بر یادگیری واژگان زبان آموزان سطح پیشرفته ی ایرانی | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 15، دوره 12، شماره 36، آذر 1399، صفحه 333-361 اصل مقاله (649.21 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2019.26679.1718 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد ظهرابی* 1؛ پریا تدین2 | ||
| 1دکترای تخصصی آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، استا یار دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| راهبردهای یادگیریِ واژگان میتوانند روندِ فراگیریِ زبان را تسهیل نمایند. پژوهشِ حاضر بر آن است تا به بررسی سه نوع رایجِ راهبردهای یادگیری واژگان- مشتمل بر حفظی، یاد افزا و یادگیری واژه در متن و جمله - بپردازد که به وسیلة زبانآموزان سطح پیشرفتة ایرانی انجام شدهاست. روش پژوهش، شبهتجربی است که دربرگیرندة سه گروه آزمایشی و یک گروهِ گواه است. هشتاد زبانآموزِ دخترِ ایرانی در سطح پیشرفته (20 نفر در هر گروه)، در این پژوهش شرکت کردند که بر اساسِ آزمونِ تعیینِ سطح سریع، ارزیابی شدند. حدودِ صد و پنجاه واژه از کتابِ «واژههای ضروری بارونز برای تافل» برای آموزشدهی برگزیده شدند. این واژهها در سه روش گوناگون به صورتِ حفظی، یادافزا و یادگیری واژه با متن و جمله، به وسیلة پژوهشگران در پنجاه جلسه به یادگیرندگان، آموزش داده شد. همچنین دو پسآزمونِ آنی و تأخیری از یادگیرندگان انجام شد. یافتهها با نرمافزار اس.پی.اس.اس مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. این بررسی ثابت کرد که تفاوت معناداری میانِ گروههای آزمایشی و گروه گواه وجود دارد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که افرادی که با راهبرد یادافزا و با بهرهگیری از کلیدواژه، آموزش داده شدند، بیشترین میانگین را در پسآزمونهای آنی (با میانگین ۳/۳۹) و تأخیری (با میانگین ۳۹) داشتند و در مقایسه با گروههای دیگر عملکرد بهتری را از خود نشان دادند. این یافتهها میتوانند در توسعة روشهای مؤثر آموزش واژه برای آموزگاران زبان انگلیسی مفید باشند. همچنین، این پژوهش در تلاش بود به زبانآموزان کمک نماید تا راهبرد یادافزا را به عنوان یکی از روشهایِ یادگیری واژه مورد استفاده قرار دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| روش حفظی؛ یادافزا؛ حفظ از طریق متن و جمله؛ راهبرد؛ توسعة واژه؛ راهبرد یادگیری واژه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Study of the Effects of Rote, Mnemonic and Contextualized Strategies on Advanced Iranian EFL Learners’ Lexical Development | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Zohrabi1؛ Parya Tadayyon2 | ||
| 1PhD in English Language Teaching, English Language Department, Assistant Professor, University of Tabriz | ||
| 2Master of English Language Teaching, Department of English, University of Tabriz | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Language is the sign of mental development and an instrument of understanding. It has a very important role in cognitive and social development. Language is mingled with thought. Thoughts are conveyed through language. Words are the basic units, which construct the spoken and written language. In order to express the ideas, one needs words. Therefore, words and the way of learning them are essential processes for all the speakers of a language. Communication is possible through speaking. However, in order to be a successful communicator, it is necessary to pay attention to all the skills of the language. Learning a foreign language is an essential component in foreign language learners’ lives for the challenges that they face during this process. Most of the challenges posed in this stage are due to the learners’ limited exposure to that language. Vocabulary learning is at the core of language learning. Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLS) facilitate this process. The present study aimed to investigate three common types of vocabulary learning strategies, including rote memorization, mnemonic memorization, and contextualized memorization used by advanced Iranian EFL learners. The design of this study was quasi-experimental. It consisted of three experimental groups and one control group. A website was designed by the researchers for the sake of this study. The website helped the researchers in the process of scoring and reduced the probability of cheating among the participants, so it increased the reliability of the study. Some eighty advanced female Iranian learners (20 in each group) participated in this study. The participants were selected according to the results of the Quick Placement Test. The advanced level learners were chosen on the basis of convenient sampling. At the beginning, a pretest was administered to the learners. Approximately one hundred and fifty words were selected from the book named “Borron’s Essential Words for the TOEFL”. The words were taught to the learners in fifty sessions by three different methods: rote, mnemonic and contextualized. The teacher was one of the researchers. There were also immediate and delayed posttests at the end; however, the immediate and delayed posttests were different in the order of the questions and choices. The results were analyzed by SPSS software. A one-way ANOVA was conducted. In terms of inferential statistics, this study showed that there is a significant difference between the experimental groups and the control group. The mnemonic group was meaningfully better than the contextualized group, the contextualized group outperformed the rote group meaningfully, and finally the rote group had a better performance when compared with the control group. In descriptive terms, the findings of this study showed that those who were taught using the mnemonic strategy had the highest mean in both immediate (M=39.3) and delayed (M=39) posttests, and showed a better performance than the other groups. The findings of the study have some implications for classroom practice. Therefore, this study might have some beneficial pedagogical implications for both teachers and learners by helping them redefine their proper responsibilities. In a broad sense, this study may help teachers to remember that no single L2 instructional methodology fits all learners. Strategies help determine a particular learner’s ability and willingness to work within the framework of various instructional methodologies. It is foolhardy to think that a single L2 methodology could possibly fit an entire class filled with learners who have a range of stylistic and strategic preferences. Instead, the teachers should be aware of different strategies used by learners and apply the most suitable methods. These methods could allow creative variety to meet the needs of all learners in class. The results of the present study can make writers aware of the conventions of their discipline and help teachers to be careful in using different vocabulary learning strategy types to develop vocabulary and to improve reading and writing in a more natural way. The findings of this research can also contribute to the improvement of the ability to understand the language of written academic discourse. In the present study the application of vocabulary learning strategies resulted in successful learning among language learners. It is worth mentioning that applying these strategies are fruitful for both teachers and learners. They can help both groups to be successful in their practices. Also, even less proficient learners and novice teachers can find something interesting. However, syllabus designers and material writers can use the advantages of these vocabulary learning strategies in writing and developing English materials. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Rote Strategy, Mnemonic Strategy, Contextualized Strategy, Strategy, Vocabulary Development, Vocabulary Learning Strategies | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
اسلامی راسخ، زهره و رضا رنجبری (1382). «آموزش راهبرد فرا شناختی برای یادگیری لغت». زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان دوم. دورة 7. شمارة 2. صص 15-1. پیشقدم، رضا، ابراهیم خدادادی و نسترن خوش سبک (1389). «تأثیر آموزش شفاهی و بصری مبتنی بر هوش بر روی حفظ لغت و تولیدات زبانی نوشتاری زبان آموزان ایرانی در سطح متوسطه». زبانشناسی کاربردی. دورة 1. شمارة 2. صص 395-379. خطیب، محمد، محمد حسن زاده و سعید رضایی (1390). «راهبردهای یادگیری لغت در زبان آموزان سطح متوسطه ایرانی». مطالعات بینالمللی. دورة 4. شمارة 2. صص 152-144. رضایی عباسعلی و آغازیان آراز (1387). «بررسی میزان استفاده دانش آموزان ایرانی مقطع دبیرستان از راهبردهای یادگیری لغت: مقایسه بین دانش آموزان فارسی زبان و ارمنی زبان». نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی تبریز. دورة 49. شمارة 198. صص 15-1. روحی، افسر و سید علی رضی نژاد (۱۳۹۶). «تأثیر ترکیب نمودهای مختلف توجه به صورت بر یادگیری واژگان انگلیسی دانش آموزان دبیرستان». زبان پژوهی. دورة ۹. شمارة ۲۳. صص 53-78. علوی، سید محمد و شیوا کیوان پناه (۱۳۸۴). «راهبردهای شناختی و فراشناختی یادگیری لغت در رشتههای زبان انگلیسی و غیر زبان انگلیسی». پژوهش زبانهای خارجی. دورة ۱. شمارة ۲۷. صص 83-106. فهیم، منصور و علی کمیجانی (1390). «توانایی تفکر نقادانه، دانش لغات زبان دوم و راهبردهای یادگیری لغت در زبان دوم». نشریه مطالعات زبان انگلیسی. دورة 1. شمارة 1. صص 28-23. کشاورز، محمد حسین، محمود رضا عطایی و سهیلا مصاحبی محمدی (۱۳۸۵). «تأثیر آموزش راهبرد ترسیم معنایی بر یادگیری واژگان توسط فراگیران زبان انگلیسی». نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی تبریز. دورة ۴۹. شمارة ۱۹۸. صص ۱۷۶-۱۴۹. References
Ahmadi Safa. M., & Hamzavi, R. (2013). The effect of mnemonic key word method on vocabulary learning and long-term retention. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12 (1), 1-15.
Alavi, S. M., & Kavianpanah, Sh. (2006) Cognitive and metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies across fiels of study. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 1 (27), 83-106 [In Persian].
American Heritage Publishing Company (2014). The American heritage science dictionary (2nd ed). America: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Retried from <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/rote learning.>
Amirian, S. M. R., & Momeni, S. (2012). Definition-based versus contextualized vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 223 230.
Arikan, A., & Taraf, H. U. (2010). Contextualizing young learners’ English lessons with cartoons: focus on grammar and vocabulary. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 5212- 5215.
Bahari, M. (1989). Moonlighting among Iranian teachers. United States: Arizona State University.
Cook, V. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. London, New York, Melbourne, Auckland: Edward Arnold.
Du, Y. (2012). The application of mnemonic to improve the middle school student’s English achievement. Journal of Education and Learning, 1 (2), 300-310.
Eslami Rasekh, Z., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 7 (2), 1-15 [In Persian].
Fahim, M., & Komijani, A. (2011). Critical thinking ability, L2 vocabulary knowledge, and L2 vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of English Studies, 1 (1), 23-28 [In Persian].
Keshavarz, M. H., Ataei, M. R., & Mossahebi Mohammadi, S. (2006). The effect of semantic mapping strategy instruction on vocabulary learning of intermediate EFL students. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 49 (198), 149-176 [In Persian].
Khatib. M., Hassanzadeh. M., & Rezaei. S. (2011). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners. International Education Studies, 4 (2), 144-152 [In Persian].
Marzban, A., & Azimi Amoli, F. (2012). The effect of mnemonic strategies instruction on the immediate and delayed information retrieval of vocabulary learning in EFL elementary learners. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46 (1), 4957-4961.
Mondria, J. A. (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: an experimental comparison of the “meaning inferred method” and the “meaning-given method”. SSLA, 25 (1), 473-499.
Nemati, A. (2010). Enhancing long-term retention by memory vocabulary learning strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7 (1), 171-195.
Pishghadam, R., & Shayesteh, S. (2016). Emotioncy: A post-linguistic approach toward vocabulary learning and retention. Journal of Social Sciences, 39 (1), 27-36.
Pishghadam. R., Khodadady. E., & Khosh Sabk. N. (2010). The impact of visual and verbal intelligences-based teaching on the vocabulary retention and written production of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. The Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 379-395 [In Persian].
Quick Oxford Placement Test (2004). Quick Placement Test (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press and the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Retrieved from <https://dokumen.tips/documents/quick-placement test-2.html>
Rahimi, H. (2014). The effect of method of vocabulary presentation (code-mixing, thematic clustering, and contextualization) on L2 vocabulary recognition and production. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98 (1), 1475-1484.
Rashidi, N., & Omid, A. (2011). A survey on Iranian EFL learners' beliefs on the role of rote memorization in learning vocabulary and its effect on vocabulary achievement. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15 (1), 139-161.
Rezaei, O., & Dezhara, S. (2011). An investigation of the possible effects of favored contexts in second language vocabulary acquisition. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 97- 114.
Rezaei. A. A., & Aghaziyan. A. (2008). High School Students' Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Comparison between Farsi-Speaking and Armenian Speaking Language Learners. Journal of Humanistics Faculty of Tabriz University, 49 (198), 1-15 [In Persian].
Rouhi, A., & Razinezhad, S. A. (2017). The Effect of Different Mixtures of FonF Manifestations on High School Students’ Vocabulary Learning. Zabanpazhuhi, 9 (23), 53-78 [In Persian].
Rubin. J. & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a successful language learner. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle.
Sagarra, N., & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (2), 228 - 243.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy, Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shariffar, S., & Khoii, R. (2013). Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT Journal, 67 (2), 199-209.
Sinhaneti, K., & Kyaw, E. K. (2012). A study of the role of rote learning in vocabulary learning strategies of Burmese students. US- China Education Review, 12 (1), 987- 1005.
Siriganjanavong, V. (2013). The mnemonic keyword method: effects on the vocabulary acquisition and retention. English Language Teaching, 1(6), 101-120.
Wilkins, d. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold LTD.
Wu, Q. (2014). A Rote strategy in memorizing vocabulary for ESL learners. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143 (1),294- 301.
Xu, L., Xiong, Q., & Qin, Y. (2018). Research on contextualized memorizing of meaning in foreign language vocabulary. World Journal of Education, 8 (2), 168-173.
Yu, L. (2011). Vocabulary recognition and memorization: a comparison of two methods. (Unpublished Thesis). Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:429600/fulltext01.pdf
وبگاهها www.edubridge.ir
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 766 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 424 |
||
