- Abraham, L. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090246
- AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76-95. https://doi:10.1111/jcal.12004
- Adigüzel, T., Capraro, R. M., & Wilson, V. L. (2011). An examination of teacher acceptance of handheld computers. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 12-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ958994.pdf
- Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 3(2), 115-125. https://ijreeonline.com/article-1-120-en.pdf
- Albaaly, E., & Higgin, S. (2012). The impact of interactive whiteboard technology on medical students’ achievement in ESL essay writing: An early study in Egypt. The Language Learning Journal, 2(47), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.543953
- Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
- Alshaikhi, M. H. (2017). Investigating teachers’ attitudes towards the effectiveness of using interactive whiteboards when teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Modern Education Review, 7(3), 210-219. http://www.academicstar.us/
- Amiri, R., & Sharifi, M. (2014). The influence of using interactive whiteboard on writings of EFL students regarding adverbs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.413
- Amolo, S., & Dees, E. (2007). The influence of interactive whiteboards on fifth-grade student perceptions and learning experiences. Action Research Exchange, 6(1), 1-9. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/189470194.pdf
- Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal, 15-18.
- Barani, G. (2013). The impact of computer assisted language learning (CALL) on vocabulary achievement of Iranian university students EFL learners. International Journal of Basic Science & Applied Research, 2(5), 531-537. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3DBarani%2C%2BGH.%2B%282013
- Barcroft, J. (2004). Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0267658304sr233oa
- Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898010.pdf
- Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.V8N51.2000
- BECTA (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf
- Beeland, W. D. Jr. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education, Trinity College, Dublin. http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/research/international_research/usa/beeland_am.pdf
- Brown, S. (2009). Interactive whiteboards in education. JISC Technologies Centre, Joint Information Systems Committee. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Interactivewhiteboards.pdf
- Bull, S. (2000). Focusing on feedback. In E. Broady (Ed.), Second language writing in a computer environment (pp. 157-175). CILT.
- Caws, C. (2006). Assessing group interactions online: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 19-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066482.pdf
- Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 217-228). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Cojocnean, D. M. (2015). The vocabulary learning behavior of Romanian high school students in a digital context. University of Exeter. https://core.ac.uk/reader/43095640
- Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press.
- Dashtestani, S. R. (2019). Teaching EFL with interactive whiteboards: Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks? Journal of Language Horizons, 3(1), 207-224. https://dx.doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2019.26689.1139
- Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
- Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology 14(3), 51-71. http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num3/elolaoskoz.pdf
- Ertan, Y., Yucel, E., Kara, E., & Karabiyik, L. (2011). The effects of interactive whiteboard usage on students’ learning level and application in financial markets courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 12(3), 23-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/156032
- Faghih, E., & Hosseini, S. B. (2012). Asynchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback and the correct use of definite/indefinite articles. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 9(1), 21-36. https://itdl.org/Journal/Jan_12/Jan_12.pdf
- Gatlin, M. (2007). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on student achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia, Athens.
- http://athenaeum.libs.uga.edu
- Ghaniabadi, S., Amirian, S. M. R., Khalilabad, M. H., & Nafchi, A. M. (2016). The effect of multimedia texts presented on interactive whiteboards on Iranian high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 430-446. http://www.ijhcs.com/index
- Ghazi, S., & Zamanian, M. (2019). The influence of asynchronous computer-mediated versus conventional corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 8(1), 169-181. http://jslte.iaushiraz.ac.ir/article_684620_5221df3c95fcab9501241d8cce09bb47.pdf
- Ghufron, M. A. (2019). Exploring an automated feedback program ‘Grammarly’ and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment. In D. Mulyadi, R. Rahim, S. Aimah, Y. Nugraheni, M. Ifadah, & H. D., Santoso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd English language and literature international conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019. (pp. 307-315). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285308
- Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 60-81. http://llt.msu.edu/%20vol4num1/groot/
- Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x
- Han, Z. H. (2001). Fine-tuning corrective feedback. Foreign Language Annals 34(6), 582-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02105.x
- Henderson, C. (2019). The effect of feedback timing on L2 Spanish vocabulary acquisition in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819832907
- Ho, M., & Savignon, S. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269-290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24147912
- Hodge, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive white board: A teacher's journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511123
- Hulstijn, J. (2000). The use of computer technology in experimental studies of second language acquisition: A survey of some techniques and some ongoing studies. Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 32-43. http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num2/hulstijn/index.html
- Katwibun, H. (2013). Using an interactive whiteboard in vocabulary teaching. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 116, 674-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.278
- Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). Analyzing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x
- Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2020). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912354
- Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
- Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield. http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
- Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z
- Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24-40). Routledge.
- Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803311
- Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
- Long, M. H. (2006). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lu, F. L., (2010). English learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition in the video-based CALL program. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 51-66. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/English-Learners-%E2%80%99-Incidental-Vocabulary-in-the-Lin/bbeb7ee19e31932c3bb125c39bcd381feea729ee
- Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51-81. https//doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X
- Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183-218.
- Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
- Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. https//doi.org/ 10.1017/S0261444812000365
- Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803998
- McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
- Mechling, L., Gast, D., & Krupa, K. (2007). Impact of smart board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 37(10), 1869-1882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0361-9
- Moss, G., Carrey, J., Levaaic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the school’s whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London challenge. Institute of Education, University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10022066/1/Moss2007whiteboardsRR816.pdf
- Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541721
- Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
- Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. https://www.lextutor.ca/cover/papers/nation_2006.pdf
- Oberg, A. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness of a CALL-based approach and a card-based approach to vocabulary acquisition and retention. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 118-144. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/Calico/article/download/17080/19555
- Pan, Y. (2010). The effect of teacher error feedback on the accuracy of EFL student writing. TEFLIN Journal, 21(1), 57-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v21i1/57-77
- Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patters of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241
- Rabiee, M. (2010). Facilitating learning to gather in Iranian context: Three collaborative oral feedback models in EFL writing classes. Sino-US English Teaching, 7(3), 10-22. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/55a7797332a74.pdf
- Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
- Razagifard, P., & Rahimpour, M. (2010). The effect of computer mediated corrective feedback on the development of second language learners’ grammar. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning 7(5). 11-30. http://itdl.org/Journal/May_2010/article2002.htm
- Razagifard, P., & Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 11(2), 1-17. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-9a758c3e-8f18-4945-8e7b-d7a8cecf16d7
- Sachs, R., & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 199-227). Oxford University Press.
- Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2019). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164
- Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96-120. http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/sauro.pdf
- Schmid, E., C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005
- Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- Selwyn N. (2003). ICT in non-formal youth and adult education: Defining territory. OECD/NCAL International roundtable. http://www.literacy.org/ICTconf/OECD_Selwy n_final.pdf
- Seiffedin, A. H., & El-Sakka, S. M. F. (2017). The impact of direct-indirect corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 166-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.02
- Shams, N., & Dabaghi, A. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: The effect of online annotations via interactive whiteboards. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 6(14), 37-56. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_3321_6cfae049799c952431aa32715f2a18e9.pdf
- Shaqaqi, M., & Soleimani, H. (2018). Effects of asynchronous and conventional paper-and-pen metalinguistic feedback on L2 learners' use of verb tense. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 5(3), 55-72. https://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1680_9eacb35cd225e9ba3faef4d34daecd1a.pdf
- Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F1362168806lr203oa
- Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
- Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge. https://moodle.phooe.at/pluginfile.php/144864/mod_resource/content/1/Hinkel_2011_Handbook_of_Research_in_SLA_2.pdf#page=612
- research in second language teaching and learning
- Shen, C., & Chuang, H. (2009). An investigation on user communication behavior in an interactive whiteboard technology environment. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 8(1), 184-195. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/communications/2009/31-815.pdf
- Sippel, L. (2019). The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals, 52(3), 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12416
- Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321-1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.006
- Souhila, B., & Khadidja, M. M. (2013). We need change! The interactive whiteboard in the EFL context. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 379-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n3p379
- Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.012
- SMART Technologies Inc. (2006). Interactive whiteboards and learning improving student learning outcomes and streamlining lesson planning. http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/education/pdf/interactivewhiteboardsandlearning.pdf
- Swan, K., Schenker, J. & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 3290-3297). VieAssociation for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28842/
- Tafazoli, D., Nosratzadeh, H., & Hosseini, N. (2014). Computer-mediated corrective feedback in ESP courses: Reducing grammatical errors via Email. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(9), 355-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.341
- Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students' self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019
- Turel, Y. K. (2011). An interactive whiteboard student survey: Development, validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2441-2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.005
- Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00508.x
- Ware, P. D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. (pp. 105-122). Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ware,+P.+D.,+%26+Warschauer,+M.+(2006).&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
- Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00699.x
- Yeh, S., & Lo, J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014
- Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.523285
|