پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 951 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,816 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,001,871 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,217,460 |
تبیین تحلیلی مشارکت در مدارس از منظر زیرنظام راهبری و مدیریت سندتحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 17، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 62، دی 1400، صفحه 189-219 اصل مقاله (832.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2021.32249.3102 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا بهروزی امین1؛ لطف اله عباسی سروک* 2؛ معصومه صمدی3؛ حمید رضا رضا زاده بهادران4 | ||
| 1دانشجو دکتری گروه تربیت و مشاوره، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مدیریت اموزشی و اموزش عالی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار گروه تربیت و مشاوره، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش با هدف"اعتبارسنجی ابعاد، مولفه ها و شاخص های مشارکت مدارس در اجرای زیرنظام راهبری و مدیریت سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش"، اجرا گردید. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر داده‌ها آمیخته اکتشافی و از نظر ماهیت و نوع مطالعه، بر مبنای نظریه داده بنیاد و به روش پیمایشی مقطعی انجام شده است. در این راستا و پس از شناسایی و تاکید ابعاد، مولفه ها و شاخص ها در بخش کیفی، در نهایت 61 شاخص در قالب 17 مولفه و 6 بعد از طریق جامعه آماری پژوهش در مرحله کمی که شامل 400 نفر از مدیران مدارس دوره دوم متوسطه شهر تهران بود، با نمونه آماری 196 نفر(138 مدیر زن و 58 مدیر مرد) اعتبارسنجی شد، که از طریق نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب و پرسشنامه مورد نظر را تکمیل نمودند. بر‌اساس نتایج تحلیل عاملی تاییدی، 61 شاخص این پژوهش در قالب 6 بعد قلمرو مشارکت: مبنای مشارکت، سطح مشارکت، فرم مشارکت، حدود مشارکت و درجه مشارکت، مورد تایید قرارگرفت. لذا باتوجه به نتایج پژوهش مذکور، الگوی حاضر می تواند به عنوان راهنمای عمل مدیران مدارس دوره متوسطه درراستای عملیاتی نمودن برنامه های زیرنظام راهبری‌ومدیریت سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌وپرورش به شیوه‌ای نوآورانه مورداستفاده قرارگیرد تا در فرایند اتخاذ تصمیمات با بهره‌گیری از خردجمعی و جلب مشارکت‌های همگانی، عمل نموده و مشارکت جویی را در تمامی ابعاد محیط آموزشی، مدنظر قراردهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مشارکت؛ مدارس؛ زیرنظام راهبری و مدیریت تربیتی؛ سندتحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analytical Explanation of School Participation from the Perspective of Leadership and Management Subsystem Fundamental Transformation Document of Education | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Behroozi Amin1؛ Lotfollah Abbasi Servak2؛ Masoomeh Samadi3؛ Hamidreza Rezazade4 | ||
| 1Department of Education and Counseling, Central Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University,.Tehran-Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Educational Management, Central Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University,. Tehran-Iran | ||
| 3Research Institute of Education, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Department of Education and Counseling, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract The aim of this study was to "validate the dimensions, components and indicators of school participation in the implementation of the leadership and management of the document of fundamental change in education". The research in terms of applied purpose and in terms of data is exploratory mixed and in terms of nature and type of study, is based on data theory and cross-sectional survey method. In this regard, after identifying and emphasizing the dimensions, components and indicators in the qualitative sector, finally 61 indicators in the form of 17 components and 6 dimensions through the statistical population of the research in a quantitative stage that includes 400 high school principals in Tehran, a statistical sample of 196 people (138 female managers and 58 male managers) was validated, who were selected through stratified random sampling and completed the questionnaire. Based on the results of confirmatory factor analysis, 61 indicators of this research were approved in the form of 6 dimensions of participation area: basis of participation, level of participation, form of participation, limits of participation and degree of participation. Therefore, according to the results of the research, the present model can be used as a guide for high school principals in order to implement programs under the leadership and management of the document of fundamental change in education to act in the decision-making process using collective wisdom and public participation. And consider participation in all aspects of the educational environment Therefore, according to the results of the research, the present model can be used as a guide for high school principals in order to implement programs under the leadership and management of the document of fundamental change in education to act in the decision-making process using collective wisdom and public participation. And consider participation in all aspects of the educational environment. Introduction The document of fundamental change of education is considered as one of the most valid upstream documents in the Ministry of Education. This document was approved in 2011 with 23 operational goals and 131 strategies seeks to create a fundamental change in the education system based on the philosophy of Islamic education. A fundamental issue, especially a decade after the adoption of the document, is facing experts and researchers in the field of education, review and pathology of the implementation of the document of fundamental change. At present, several programs have been developed under the operational objectives of the document and its solutions in the form of six sub-systems (provincial, provincial and school areas) And the school must implement its split-share programs, which are listed in six subsystems. However, the outcome of the school share programs in the six subsystems does not have the necessary inclusion and effectiveness as a school transformation program at the level of the transformation document and is only a heavy burden on the school. This is while the transformation document should be implemented in the school and its executive crystallization should be reflected in the executive regulations of the schools (Bayat, et al,2020). Undoubtedly, management, fundamental change in education must be done very intelligently and consciously to have the highest efficiency and effectiveness in the shortest time and at the lowest cost. This management depends on specific mechanisms and requirements and should be able to use all facilities and opportunities to transform existing education into desirable education(Navid,2012). Despite the document's emphasis on public participation in education, the exact concept of "participation" and the ways in which it operates in schools have not been provided. Therefore, it encouraged the researcher to define this word precisely from the perspective of the authors of the document and other theorists, as well as the strategies for making it operational at the school level. Method The research questions are as follows: 1.What are the dimensions, components and constructive indicators of the school participation model for the implementation of the leadership sub-system of the document of fundamental change in education? 2. Are the dimensions, components and indicators valid enough? Statistical population According to the information received from the Statistics and Information Center of the Deputy Minister of Secondary Education of the Ministry of Education, there are 400 principals of public secondary schools in Tehran. According to Morgan table, 196 managers were selected as a sample and based on the sampling method classified according to volume. This study is practical in terms of purpose, considering that it seeks to improve the participation of schools to implement the document of fundamental change in the country's education. The method of this research is an exploratory mix (qualitative and quantitative) in terms of data. In the present study, in order to identify and confirm the measurement factors, the validity of this questionnaire was tested separately for each dimension by confirmatory factor analysis. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm the normality of the population. It shows that the obtained (K-S) is not significant and this indicates that the distribution is normal. Measuring tool: A multivariate researcher-made questionnaire based on the findings of the qualitative section was used to measure the variables of the foundation data model. This questionnaire has been approved by experts with the help of Delphi technique (in 2 stages). The validity of the mentioned instrument (questionnaire) was done through Cronbach's alpha and its validity was done through content and confirmation validity. Confirmatory content validity (CVR) has been used to examine the dimensions’ identification questionnaire, components of school participation. The total validity of the questionnaire is equal to 0.85 and because it is more than 0.7, it can be said that the questionnaire has a high validity. Findings During the selective coding, 6 dimensions, 17 components and 61 indicators of school participation for the implementation of the leadership subsystem and management of the document of fundamental change in education were approved, and these results are presented in the table. Dimensions of participation in schools in order to implement the leadership and management subsystem of the document of fundamental change in education with the help of selective coding in the form of data theory of the foundation under six headings: "participation area, participation basis, participation level, participation form, participation limits and degree of participation" has been achieved. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Participation, school system, Subsystems of leadership and educational management, Fundamental transformation document | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abili, Kh. Naderi, A. Oraee Y.B. Nastizaee, N. (2013). Designing a participatory management model. Case study of Zahedan City schools. Public management Research. The sixth year. Number twenty-one, Fall 2013: 101-122. (Text in Persian). Afkhami, K. Salavati, A.Ahmadi, K.Irandoost, M. (2019).Explain the concept pf organizational participation and present its evaluation model in government organizations. Quarterly Journal of General Policy in Management. Tenth year. No. 36. (Text in Persian). Arnestein, SR. (1969) “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 24-216:(35) 4. www.planning.org/pas/memo/2007/mar/pdf/JAPA35No4.pdf. Bayat, M. and Ghaffari, A. (2020). Deputy of Socio-Cultural Research of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Obstacles to the Implementation of the Document of Fundamental Change in Education. Office of Education and Culture Studies of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (Text in Persian). Birkinshaw, J.Hamel,g. J. Mol, Management Innovation. Academy of management Review 2008; vol.33, No.4,825-845. Bozorgi, K. and Daneshpoor, N. (2005). An Attitude on the Dimensions of Participation in Education. Cultural Studies Office of the Education and Research Commision of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Serial number 7489. (Text in Persian). Dorri, N. (1990). People’s Participation in Economic Activities (an analysis of concepts and methods), Master Thesis of Imam Sadegh University. Tehran. (Text in Persian). Ghasemi, P. I. (2003). Public Participation in Education. Tehran: Education Research Institute Publication. (Text in Persian). Dachler, Peter, H. and Wilpert Bernhard (1978)., Conceptual Dimensions and Boundaries of Participation in organizations: A Critical Evaluations, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-39. Haghighi, M. (2012). The Role of Decentralization and Delegation in the Structure of Education. Journal of Educational Management Research, 3(11), 57-74 (Text in Persian). Hooman,. H. A. (2008). Scientific Guide to Qualitative Research. Tehran. Samt Publication. (Text in Persian). Hooshmand, S. and Fooladi, A. (2015). The role of Public Participation in the quality of Education. The third Scientific Conference on Research in Educational Sciences and Psychology of Social and Cultural Injuries in Iran. (Text in Persian). Jahanian, R. (2009). Strategies of the Development of Participation in Instructional Branches from the Managers Point of View in Tehran City. Educational Administration Research Quarterly, 1(1), 113-130. (Text in Persian). Kamrani, M. Sadraee, M. Bayat, M. (2003). Examining Employees’ Attitudes toward Behavior Proposing with the Logic of Planned Behavior Theory. Case Study: Tehran Regional Electricity Company. Eleventh Conference and Fifth National Festival of Proposals. (Text in Persian). Lock,E. A., Schweiger, D. M., “Participation in Decision-Making One More Look”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, 1979, pp. 265-339. M.Walker, R. Damanpour, F. A. Devec, C. (2010) Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management, JPART 21:367-386. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq043, Mainzer,k (2011). Interdisiplinarity and innovation dynamics. On convergence of research, technology, economy, and society, Poiesis Prax 7:275-289. Matin, N. (2012). The Need to Participate in Education: Shortcomings and Solutions. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Society of Education. Fall and winter 2012. No. 3. (Text in Persian). Mohammadi, A. Navid, A. M. Toorani, H. and Zolfaghari, R. (2020). Analysis of Competency Criteria of Education Staff Managers in the Level of Leadership and Management Subsystem: Report a Qualitative Study by the Responsible Author. Journal of Human Resources Training and Development. Spring 2020. No.24. Scientific Research. Isc/p.28.25-52. (Text in Persian). Molaee, A. M. (2016). Review and critique of the document of fundamental investigating the relationship between capability-based human resource management and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Organizational Performance with Respect to the Moderating Role of Bilateral Innovation. Business Reviews. No. 96. http://sobhe-no.ir/newspaper/print/148/9/5039 (Text in Persian). Nastizayee, N. Abili, Kh. Naderi, A. and Oraee, Y.B. (2013). Designing a Participatory Management Model. Case Study: Schools in Zahedan City. Public Management Research. The sixth year. No.21. (Text in Persian). Navid, A. M. (2010). Collection of Articles on the Pathology of Religious Education. Tehran: School Publication. (Text in Persian). Navid, A. M. (2012). Managerial Requirements for Fundamental Change in Education. Cultural Strategy Quarterly. No. 17-18. P.299. (Text in Persian). Obsa Tolesa, D. (2010). Decentralization and Community Participation in Education in Ethiopia: Paczuska, A: Skills, Qualifications, and Profession. A Higher Education. View: Economics’ of Education. Great. Briton, 11(4), 418-438. Peter, M. Senge. (2006) Change dance. Translated by Akbari, H. and Soltani, M. Tehran: Asia Publication. (Text in Persian). Rahnavard, A. F. (1998). Dimensions of Participation in Decision making. Excerpt from the author’s doctoral dissertation defended at Flinders University in Australia. (Text in Persian). Rezvani, M. B. Toghraee, M. (2011). The Role of Organizational Social Capital in the Tendency to Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-based Companies. Case Study: Companies Located in Science and Technology Park of Tehran University. Transformation Management Research Letter. Third year. Issue 6, Fall and winter: 28-53. (Text in Persian). School Executive Regulations (2000). Approved Session No. 652. Dated 2000.8.10. Higher Education Council. (Text in Persian). Schregle, J) .1970(., “Forms of participative management”, Industrial Relations, Vol.9. pp. 117-122 Schlossberg, Marc A, and Elliot Shuford .(2005)“Delineating ‘Public’ and ‘Participation.’” PPGIS. URISA Journal –15 :(2) 1626. htp://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/jspui/bitstream/2/1/1343/1794Schlossberg.pdf. The program of Leading and Managing the Formal Public Education System (2017). Higher Education Council. (Text in Persian). Theoretical Foundations of the Document of Fundamental Change in the Formal Public Education System of the Islamic republic of Iran. (2011). p.367. http://www.shmoton.ir/my_doc/ihcs/article/sarfasla/tahavol%20dar%20nezame%20talim.PDF (Text in Persian). Zhang, J., & Geare, A., & Okane, C, (2016), "The Interactive Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Capability-based HRM on Firm Performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity" industrial marketing management, 59,131-143. (Text in Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 597 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 417 |
||
