پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 916 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,522 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,235,281 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,654,110 |
پیشبینی تحصیلگریزی بر اساس معنای تحصیل، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و تنشگرهای تحصیلی | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 18، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 63، فروردین 1401، صفحه 33-46 اصل مقاله (515.29 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2021.32463.3111 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فریبا فرازی* | ||
| دکترای تخصصی روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات، علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| حضور در مدرسه برای پیشرفت تحصیلی، اجتماعی و عاطفی کودکان و موفقیت در آیندۀ آنها بسیار مهم است. از این رو، پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیشبینی تحصیلگریزی بر اساس معنای تحصیل، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و تنشگرهای تحصیلی انجام شده است. مطالعة حاضر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است که به شیوة نمونهگیری تصادفی تعداد 255 نفر از دانشآموزان دبیرستانی و هنرستانی مقطع متوسطه دوم شهر خوسف در سال تحصیلی 1398-99 انتخاب شده و از طریق چهار مقیاس معنای تحصیل، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی، تنشگرهای تحصیل و تحصیلگریزی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام به گام با کمک نرم افزار SPSS نسخۀ 23 استفاده گردید. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان دادند که از میان ده معنای تحصیل، حرفه در گام اول و فشار روانی در گام دوم، عملکرد تحصیلی (از ابعاد خودکارآمدی تحصیلی) در گام سوم و همینطور از میان ابعاد تنشگرهای تحصیلی، ناکامی و استرس خودتحمیلشده در گام چهارم و پنجم بهطور معناداری 37 درصد از واریانس تحصیلگریزی دانشآموزان را پیشبینی می‌کنند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که معنای تحصیل، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و تنشگرهای تحصیل نقش مهمی در پیشبینی تحصیلگریزی دارند. بنابراین میتوان با پررنگتر شدن معنای تحصیل و هدفمندی آنان از تحصیل، آموزش خودکارآمدی و تقویت توانمندیهای آنها و کاهش تنشگرها میزان گرایش به تحصیلگریزی را در آنها کاهش داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| معنای تحصیل؛ خودکارآمدی تحصیلی؛ تنشگرهای تحصیل؛ تحصیلگریزی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Predicting Academic Avoidance Based on the Meaning of Education, Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Stressors | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fariba Farazi | ||
| Ph.D. in Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract This study has been conducted with the aim of predicting academic avoidance based on the meaning of education, academic self-efficacy and academic stressors. The present research is a descriptive correlational study in which 255 high school and vocational school students in Khusf County were selected through random sampling method in the academic year 2019-2020 and were studied based on four scales of the meaning of education, academic self-efficacy, academic stressors and academic avoidance. The stepwise regression analysis results demonstrated that among the ten meanings of education, profession in the first step and stress in the second step, academic performance in the third step and also among the dimensions of academic stressors, failure and self-imposed stress in the fourth and fifth steps significantly predict 37% of the variance of students’ academic avoidance. Introduction Failure to attend school (related to academic avoidance) has consequences. Among other things, it affects learning and development (Carroll, 2010) and puts young people at risk of school dropout (Crystel et al., 2007). Therefore, it is important to identify the factors affecting academic avoidance. According to Finning et al. (2017), a wide range of individual and external factors are associated with school attendance problems (e.g., academic avoidance). One of the individual factors is the meaning of education. The meaning of education refers to the internal implication of education for the learner and education may be considered by some students as a way to achieve a profession and for others as a source of pressure (Henderson-King & Smith, 2006). Further, one of the individual factors that has a protective role in school dropout (related to academic avoidance) is academic self-efficacy (Brun et al., 2019). Academic self-efficacy is defined as students’ belief and self-confidence in their ability to succeed in academic tasks (Gore, 2006) and is recognized as a valid predictor of academic outcomes (Ikman et al., 2019). Among the external factors, one can refer to academic stressors. Stress, especially academic stress, is applied to the feeling of increasing need for knowledge and at the same time, the individual’s perception of not having enough time to achieve the desired knowledge and the individual’s evaluation of experiencing inconsistencies between situational demands and intrapersonal resources (Godzella & Baloglu, 2001). Due to the limited studies in this field, the purpose of this study is to predict academic avoidance based on the meaning of education, academic stressors and academic self-efficacy. Methodology This research is a descriptive correlational study in which 255 high school and vocational school students in Khusf County were selected through random sampling method in the academic year 2019-2020 and were studied based on four the following scales: A) Meaning of Education Questionnaire: This questionnaire was designed by Henderson-King and Smith in 2006 to assess the meaning of education, which consists of 86 items and measures ten components. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales of the meaning of education were as follows: profession (0/78), independence (0/69), future (0/63), learning (0/80), self (0/77), next step (0/44), social (0/79), the world around (0/76), stress (0/69), liberation (0/61) and the whole scale (0/94). B) Academic Stressors Questionnaire: This questionnaire was developed by Godzella (1991; cited in Gadzella & Baloglu, 2001). In the present study, the questionnaire reliability coefficients were obtained through Cronbach’s alpha to be 0/87, 0/73, 0/70, 0/56, 0/76 and 0/71, respectively, for the whole scale and subscales of failures, conflicts, pressures, changes and self-imposed stress. C) Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: This questionnaire was developed by Mazaheri and Sadeqi in 2015 to measure students’ academic self-efficacy. In the present study, the questionnaire reliability coefficients were obtained through Cronbach’s alpha to be 0/92, 0/86, 0/85 and 0/70, respectively, for the whole scale and subscales of academic performance self-efficacy, academic skills self-efficacy and future academic self-efficacy. D) Academic Avoidance Questionnaire: This scale was developed by Khormaei and Saleh Ardestani (2015) and contains 21 items. In the present study, the questionnaire reliability coefficients were obtained through Cronbach’s alpha to be 0/95, 0/90 and 0/91, respectively, for the whole scale and subscales of academic aversion and school avoidance. Findings This study was performed on 255 senior high school students in Khusf County. To investigate the main research hypothesis (there is a significant relationship between the meaning of education, academic stressors and academic self-efficacy with academic avoidance), stepwise regression analysis was used, the results of which are reported in Table (1). According to Table (1), the results suggested that in the first step, the variable of profession as the strongest predictor variable alone predicts 15% of the variance of academic avoidance. Considering the significance level, the role of this component of the meaning of education in predicting academic avoidance can be explained (f= 43/51, df= 253, p <0/001). In the second step of this analysis, the variable of stress as another strong variable after the variable of profession entered the equation of academic avoidance prediction, which with its addition, the predictive power increased to 28%. Considering the significance level, the role of this component of the meaning of education in predicting academic avoidance can be explained (f= 48/45, df= 252, p <0/001). In the third step, the variable of academic performance as another strong variable after the variables of profession and stress entered the equation of academic avoidance prediction, which increased the predictive power to 34% (f= 43/17, df= 251, p <0/010). The results also indicated that in the fourth step, the variable of failure as another strong variable after the variables of profession, stress and academic performance entered the equation of academic avoidance prediction, which increased the predictive power to 36% (f= 34/33, df= 250, p <0/030). Finally, in the fifth step of this analysis, the variable of self-imposed stress as another strong variable after the variables of profession, stress, academic performance and failure entered the equation of predicting academic avoidance, which increased the predictive power to 37% (f= 16/75, df= 294, p <0/001). Discussion and Conclusion This study aimed to predict academic avoidance based on the meaning of education, academic stressors and academic self-efficacy. The results of this study revealed that among the ten meanings of education, profession in the first step and stress in the second step, academic performance in the third step, and also among the dimensions of academic stressors, failure and self-imposed stress in the fourth and fifth steps significantly predict students’ academic avoidance. Finally, based on the obtained results, it is suggested that workshops be held to develop meaning and self-efficacy of students as well as teachers as an effective and important member in education and an important step be taken to reduce academic avoidance. However, since this research was limited to self-assessment tools, it is recommended to conduct qualitative research to complete the results and achieve a deep understanding of students’ opinions in this area, using more diverse tools (such as observation and interview). Moreover, the obtained results are limited to this statistical population; therefore, it is suggested to consider a wider population in future studies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Meaning of education, Academic self-efficacy, Academic stressors, Academic avoidance | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Astin, A.W., Oseguera, L., Sax, L.J., & Korn, W.S. (2002). The American freshman: Thirty-five year trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute. Baezat, S., Aflakifard, H., & Shahidi, N. (2016).The Relationship of Knowledge Management, Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Creativity in Shiraz Pre-School Centers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 7(28), 169-184. [Text in persian] Bandura, A. (2015). On deconstructing commentaries regarding alternative theories of self-regulation. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1025-1044. doi: 10.1177/01492063 15572826 Bandura, A. (2006). “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency”. Journal of Psychological Science, 1(2), 1-17. Berg, I., Butler, A., Franklin, J., Hayes, H., Lucas, C., & Sims, R. (1993). DSM-III-R Disorders, Social Factors and Management of School Attendance Problems in the Normal Population. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(7), 1187–1203. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01782.x Brown, T. M., Galindo, C., Quarles, B., & Cook, A. L. J. (2019). Self‑Efficacy, Dropout Status, and the Role of In‑School Experiences Among Urban, Young Adult School‑Leavers and Non‑leavers. The Urban Review,51, 816–844. Carey, W., Crocker, A., Elias, E., Feldman, H., & Coleman, W. (2009). Chronic Health Conditions. In H. Feldman (Eds), Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics 343-354. Imprint: Saunders. Carroll, H. C. M. (2010). The effect of pupil absenteeism on literacy and numeracy in the primary school. School Psychology International, 31, 115–131. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ879614 Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, M. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 325–339. Dupere, V., Dion, E., Leventhal, T., Archambault, I., Crosnoe, R., & Janosz, M. (2018). High School Dropout in Proximal Context: The Triggering Role of Stressful Life Events. Child Development, 89(2), 107-122. Eakman, A. M., Kinney, A. R., Schierl, M. L., & Henry, K. L. (2019). Academic performance in student service members/veterans: effects of instructor autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and academic problems. Educational Psychology, 1–22. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1605048 Finning, K., Harvey, K., Moore, D., Ford, T., Davis, B., & Waite, P. (2017). Secondary school educational practitioners’ experiences of school attendance problems and interventions to address them: a qualitative study. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 23(2), 213–225. doi:10.1080/13632752.2017.1414442 Florêncio, C. B. S., Ramos, M. F. H., & Silva, S. S. da C. (2017). Adolescent Perceptions of Stress and Future Expectations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 27(66), 60–68. doi:10.1590/1982-43272766201708 Gadzella, B. M, Baloglu, M. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency of student-life stress inventory. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 28(2), 84-94. Galanaki, E., & Sideridis, G. (2018). Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood, Criteria for Adulthood, and Identity Development in Greek Studying Youth: A Person-Centered Approach. Emerging Adulthood, 22.1-21. doi: 10.1177/2167696818777040 Gravand, Fariborz and Shokri, Omid (2008). Educational Stressors and Reactions to Educational Stressors: Testing the effect of mediating coping styles. Journal of Psychology, 3 (12), 122-101. )Text in persian) Hancock, K. J., Lawrence, D., Shepherd, C. C. J., Mitrou, F., & Zubrick, S. R. (2016). Associations between school absence and academic achievement: Do socioeconomics matter? British Educational Research Journal, 43, 415–440. doi: 10.1002/berj.3267 Henderson-King, D., & Smith, M. N. (2006). Meanings of education: Work motivation and personal values as predictors. Social Psychology of Education, 9(2), 195–221. Heyne, D., Gren-Landell, M., Melvin, G., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2018). Differentiation Between School Attendance Problems: Why and How? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.03.006 Ibrahim, R., Zamri Mansor, A., & Amin, L. (2012). The meaning and practices of academic professionalism: views from academics in a research University. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 520-527. Issazadegan, A., Hassani, M., & Ahmadian, L. (2009). University Students and Meanings of Education. Journal of Strategy for Culture, 2(7), 147-165. (Text in persian) Jafari, L., Hejazi, M., & Sobhi, A. (2020). Investigating the relationship between academic resilience with students' academic performance and mediating academic meaning. Journal of School Psychology, 9(3), 35-49. )Text in persian) Kadkhodaei, M. S., & Karami, Z. (2017). The Relationship between Optimism and Meaning of Education with Academic Motivation of Students. Higher Education Letter, 9(39), 143-159. )Text in persian) Karaman, M. A., Lerma, E., Vela, J. C., & Watson, J. C. (2019). Predictors of Academic Stress Among College Students. Journal of College Counseling, 22(1), 41–55. doi:10.1002/jocc.12113 Khorrami, F., & Saleh Ardestani, S. (2016). Predicting Avoidance Based Learning Approaches with Mediation of Goals Orientation. Iranian Educational Psychology Association in collaboration with Al-Zahra University, Summary of Articles of the Third National Conference on School Psychology. Isfahan: Samand Publications. )Text in persian) Lawrence, D., Dawson, V., Houghton, S., Goodsell, B., & Sawyer, M. (2019). Impact of mental disorders on attendance at school. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 5-21. DOI: 10.1177/0004944118823576 Mazaheri, Z., & Sadeghi, A. (2015). Development and Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Students' Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. New Educational Approaches, 10(2), 61-80. )Text in persian) Misra, R. & Castillo, L. (2004). Academic Stress among College Students: Comparison of American and International Students. International Journal of Stress Management, 11, 132-148. Peguero, A. A., & Shaffer, K. A. (2014). Academic Self-Efficacy, Dropping Out, and the Significance of Inequality. Sociological Spectrum, 35(1), 46–64. doi:10.1080/02732173.2014.978428 Saleh Ardestani, S., & khormaei, F.(2019). Relationship Between Parental Support and Academic Avoidance: The Mediating Role of Achievement Goals. Journal of Education and Evaluation, 11(44), 145-167. )Text in persian) Scrimin, S., Moscardino, U., Altoè, G., & Mason, L. (2016). Effects of perceived school well-being and negative emotionality on students’ attentional bias for academic stressors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 278–295. doi:10.1111/bjep.12104 Senobar, A., & Raeisi, E. (2018). The role of achievement goals and academic meaning in predicting academic success of girl students. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi Journal, 7(3), 37-52. (Text in persian) Tomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Georgieva, S., & Hernández, M. (2019). The effects of self‐efficacy, hope, and engagement on the academic achievement of secondary education in the Dominican Republic. Psychology in the Schools. doi:10.1002/pits.22321 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 748 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 526 |
||
