پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 908 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,478 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,082,053 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,548,284 |
شناسایی مؤلفه های حکمرانی خوب در نظام آموزش عالی ایران | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 17، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 59، خرداد 1400، صفحه 53-82 اصل مقاله (2.9 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2020.31217.3037 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ماریا قربانیان1؛ محمد قهرمانی* 2؛ محمود ابوالقاسمی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی گروه رهبری و توسعه آموزشی.دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| از دیدگاه بسیاری از صاحبنظران نظام فعلی آموزش عالی ایران پاسخگوی خیل عظیم مطالبات و خواستههای ذینفعان خود نبوده و در ساختار حکمرانی خویش دارای نقاط ضعف و خلأهای بسیاری است. لذا نیاز به طراحی یک الگوی حکمرانی خوب، احساس میشود. حکمرانی خوب یک فاکتور اساسی در رشد کیفیت نظام آموزش عالی است. بنابراین این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی و تدوین مؤلفههای بومی حکمرانی خوب در نظام آموزش عالی ایران انجام شد. تحقیق حاضر یک پژوهش بنیادی از نوع توصیفی- اکتشافی است. روش گردآوری دادهها در این پژوهش مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند با 23 نفر از صاحبنظران و اساتید حوزه آموزش عالی با معیار اشباع نظری بود. دادههای حاصل از این پژوهش از طریق تحلیل محتوای کیفی و با کمک نرمافزار مکس کیودا مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. بهمنظور سنجش روایی تحقیق از نظرات و رهنمودهای گروهی از خبرگان و انتخاب مؤلفهها با استفاده از مطالعه مبانی نظری استفاده شد. همچنین برای بررسی پایایی پژوهش از روش هولستی بهره گرفته شد. بر اساس نتایج 30 کد/مفهوم مختلف برای حکمرانی خوب در نظام آموزش عالی ایران از نظر صاحبنظران مصاحبه شده به دست آمد که در قالب سه مؤلفه اصلی مسئولیتپذیری مدنی و توسعه پایدار، ارزیابی مستمر و اثربخش (عملکرد دانشگاه، امور مالی و انتصابات دانشگاهی) و مدیریت و رهبری خوب جای گرفتند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حکمرانی خوب؛ آموزش عالی؛ مدیریت آموزش عالی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying the Components of Good Governance in Iranian Higher Education System | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maria Ghorbanian1؛ Mohammad Ghahramani2؛ Mahmood Abolghasemi3 | ||
| 1Shahid Beheshti UniversityPhD student in Educational Management, Department of Leadership and Development of Education, , Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Department of Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Department of Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| From the point of many experts, the current system of higher education in Iran does not meet the great demands of its stakeholders and has many weaknesses and gaps in its governance structure. Therefore, there is a need to design a good governance model. Good governance is a key factor in the growth of the quality of the higher education system. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of identifying and compiling indigenous components of good governance in the Iranian higher education system. This research is a basic descriptive-exploratory research. The method of data collection in this study was a semi-structured interview with 23 experts and professors in the field of higher education with theoretical saturation criteria. The data obtained from this study were analyzed through qualitative content analysis with the help of Maxqda software. In order to assess the validity of the research, the opinions and guidelines of a group of experts and the selection of components were used the study of theoretical foundations. Holesti method was also used to evaluate the reliability of the research. Based on the results, 30 different codes / concepts for good governance in the Iranian higher education system were obtained from the interviewed experts, which were placed in the form of the three main components of civic responsibility and sustainable development, continuous and effective evaluation (university performance, finance and university appointments) and good management and leadership | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Good governance, Higher education, Higher education management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., Dangelo, C.A. (2013). The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance. J. Inf. 7 (1), 166-175.
Abdi, B., Pourezat, A. (2019). Explaining the coordinates of good cooperation in higher education in the defense sector, Scientific Quarterly of Marine Science Education, 6 (1), 11-1.(Text in Persian).
Amiri Farahabadi, J., Abolghasemi, M., Ghahramani, M. (2015). Pathology of Policy Research Process in Iranian Higher Education System, Qualitative Studies, Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8 (4), 171-139. (Text in Persian)
Baker, S. (2013). Environmental Governance and EU Enlargement: Developments in New Member States, the Western Balkans and the Near Neighbors. in I. Gladman, ed. Central and South Eastern Europe, (London: Routledge).
Barry D., Goedegebuure L. (2018) Good Governance and Higher Education. In: Teixeira P., Shin J. (eds) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_148-1
Berger, J, B., Hudson, K, E., Blanco R, G. (2013). How Universities Work: Understanding Higher Education Organization in Northwest China. education policy analysis archives, 21(64),1-24.
Bryman, A. (2017). Corporate governance and related party transactions research. Oxford: Oxford University press Inc.
Carnegie, G. D., Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4): 431-441.
Cho, Y.H. and Palmer, J.D. (2013). Stakeholders' views of South Korea's higher education Conditionality. Georgetown Public Policy Review, 7(2), 1-23.
Dadash Karimi, Y., Mirsapasi, N. and Najaf Beigi, R. (2018). A Study of the Evolution of Governance Theories in the Higher Education System and Universities to Promote Productivity, Educational Management Innovations, 14 (1), 26-1.(Text in Persian).
Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education. 47(11), 361-382.
Enders, J., Boer, H. and Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: the reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education. 65(1), 5-23
Fath Elahi, A., Yemeni douzi Sorkhabi, M., Sabbaghian, Z., Faraskhah, M. and Ghazi Tabatabai, M. (2014). Content analysis of Iran's five development plans according to the categories of higher education governance models, Higher Education of Iran, 6 (4), 82-47.( Text in Persian).
Fitriani, S. and Muljono2, H. (2019). Beyond good governance: an ultimate key success for higher education quality. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 4(1), 210-216.
Frieden, J., Michael P. and Ernesto Z. (2018). After the Fall: The Future of Global Cooperation Geneva Report 14. London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
Gibbs G, Knapper C and Piccinin S. (2019). Disciplinary and contextually appropriate approaches to leadership of teaching in research-intensive academic departments in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4): 416–436.
Goleman, D. (2010). Primal Leadership. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Henard, F., Mitterle, A. (2009). Governance and Quality Guidelines in Higher Education: a Review of Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Guidelines. OECD/Directorate for Education, France, Paris.
Huang, F. (2018). “University governance in China and Japan: Major findings from national surveys”. International Journal of Educational Development. 63(6):12-19.
Jons, H., Hoyler, M. (2013). Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. the perspective of world university rankings. Journal of Geoforum, 46(5),45-59.
Kauffeldt, A. (2019). The Commission for Higher Education in Kenya: A Case Study Regarding the Establishment, Role and Operations on an Intermediary Body in the Higher Education System of a Developing Nation, A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (Theory and Policy Studies) University of Toronto.
Kaufmann., D, A. K., and Massimo, M. (2014). The Worldwide Governance Indicators Project: Answering the Critic. World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper No. 4149.
Kretek, P., M., Dragsic, Z., Kehm, B., M. (2013). Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members. higher education. 65(1): 39-58.
Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., Hugé, J. (2014). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production. 108(12),1-18.
Magalhaes, A., Veiga, A., Ribeiro, F.M., Sousa, S., Santiago, R. (2013). Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance. higher education. 65(2), 95-112.
Marginson, S. and Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: a glonacal agency heuristic. higher education. 43(3), 281-309.
Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing internal governance: are leadership roles and management structures in United Kingdom universities fit for the future?. higher education, 67(3), 275-294
Munawir, M., Raharjo, K., Djalil, M., Syahputra, H., Muslim, B. and Adam, M. (2019). “Dimensions of identity strength and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in establishing good university governance and performance of religious ideology-based higher educations”. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 250-272.
Mwiria, Kilemi. (2013). University Education in East Africa: The Quality Crisis. Draft. Nairobi: Bureau of Educational Research, Kenyatta University.
Niedlich, S.; Bauer, M.; Doneliene, M.; Jaeger, L.; Rieckmann, M.; Bormann, I. (2020). Assessment of Sustainability Governance in Higher Education Institutions—A Systemic Tool Using a Governance Equalizer. Journal of Sustainability.12(3): 1816-1831.
OECD. (2003). Chapter 3: Changing Patterns of Governance in Higher Education. Education Policy Analysis, OECD 2003. Online available at: http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/35747684.pdf.
Rajaei, A. (2017). Investigating the situation of governance in the education sector from the perspective of its communication system in the countries of the world, Science and Technology Policy, 7 (4): 25-34.( Text in Persian).
Saha, N.K. (2018). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Role of the Board and Audit Committee. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 10(1):210-225.
Salimi, Q., Mohammadi, M. and Nisar, Z. (2017). Analysis of faculty members' experiences in relation to the competencies and dynamics of teaching and research in the process of internationalization of higher education: Qualitative research, teaching research, 5 (2): 133-109.( Text in Persian).
Santiso, C. (2011). Good Governance and Aid Effectiveness: The World Bank and Conditionality. The Geovgetown Public Policy Review.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Agenda 21: Earth summit - united nations programme of action from Rio, Retrieved from http://www.un.org
World Bank, (2012). Putting Higher Education to Work: Skills and Research for Growth in East Asia. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Zaman, K. (2016). Quality guidelines for good governance in higher education across the globe. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1): 1-7. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,473 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 657 |
||