پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 911 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,489 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,107,629 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,565,193 |
تحلیل معنا در قالیچه کلیمی قادر مطلق با موضوع قربانی کردن بر مبنای نظریه آیکونولوژی اروین پانوفسکی | ||
| جلوه هنر | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 15، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 40، مهر 1402، صفحه 7-25 اصل مقاله (1.63 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jjh.2023.42212.1889 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محمد افروغ* | ||
| دانشیار گروه فرش، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| قالیچههای تصویری کلیمی با وجه دینی و نمادین، یکی از ساحتهای قابل مطالعه در بستر مطالعات نظری از جمله نظریه و رویکرد آیکونولوژی (شمایلشناسی) است؛ که به جهت تحلیل و تفسیر متون تصویری و دستیابی به معنای عمیق یک تصویر از طریق مضمونهای روایی، کلامی و نمادین مرتبط با آن با در نظر گرفتن بسیاری از ویژگیهای ساختاری و محتوایی اثر، میتواند قابل مطالعه و بررسی باشد. قالیچه تصویری با عنوان قادر مطلق و موضوع محوری قربانی کردن ابراهیم نبی، از مهمترین قالیچههای رایج در سنت قالیبافی کلیمیان است؛ که در این پژوهش، به شیوه آیکونولوژی مورد مطالعه قرارخواهد گرفت. پرسش مطروحه در باب موضوع این است که: مضامین کلامی، روایی و تصویری نهفته در روایت قربانی کردن اسماعیل (اسحاق) کدام است و این عناصر در پی بیان چه مفاهیم یا پیامی هستند؟ پیجویی در آشکار کردن، فهم و درک معناها و لایههای زیرین داستان از طریق شناخت ابعاد صوری (عناصر و نقشمایهها) و محتوایی و روابط بین آنها، هدف این پژوهش است. یافتههای این پژوهش در یک سطح، شامل یادآوری آموزههای بنیادین و اخلاقی دین موسوی و هویت کلیمی است که در قالب نظامهای کلامی و تصویری نمادین، نقشپردازی شدهاست؛ و در سطحی دیگر، که پیام و هدف اصلی را در بر میگیرد، ابلاغ، تاکید و نشان دادن آموزه دینی، اخلاقی و حکمی «اطاعت و تسلیم بودن» در برابر معبود از طریق آیین «قربانی» کردن و گذشتن از ممتازترین داشتهها و خواستها میباشد. این پژوهش از نوع کیفی و بنیادین، روش تحقیق توصیفی-تحلیلی و شیوه گردآوری دادهها، کتابخانهای است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| واژههای کلیدی: دین؛ کلیمی (یهودی)؛ هنر؛ قالیچه؛ قربانی کردن | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Content Analysis of "Ghader-e Motlagh" Jewish carpet with the subject of sacrifice based on the theory of iconologyErvin Panofsky’s Theory of Iconology | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Afrough | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Carpet, Faculty of Art, Arak University, Arak, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Studying the textual and contextual aspects of traditional and applied arts offers a pathway for the expansion and enhancement of the discourse analysis concerning ethnic art.This avenue opens the way and helps the audience understand the inner meanings of the narrative, verbal expressions and visual systems, and structures of the text of the artworks. Indigenious arts, especially Jewish pictorial rugs with religious and symbolic faces present an area ripe for examination within the realm of theoretical investigations, inclusive of the theory and methodology of iconology. This approach delves into the analysis and interpretation of visual compositions, aiming to unearth the profound essence of an image through its narrative, qualitative, and symbolic components, intricately woven together, while considering various structural and thematic facets of the piece. Image rugs are an expression of indigenious arts , offering a fusion of visual and textual discourse centered upon a foundation of objective narratives entwined with spiritual, national, and mythological subjects.Fabricated within specific temporal confines, these artworks serve as a means to preserve beliefs, ideals, epics, and ethnocultural memories. In the context of religiously themed works, these woven creations encapsulate not only images, visual elements, and aesthetics but also enduring ancient symbolic notions, archetypal constructs, and allegorical accounts.Deciphering these multifaceted dimensions mandates a grasp of the historical, cultural, and artistic contexts. This crucial undertaking is facilitated by methodologies such as iconology, denoting the science of image interpretation and analysis. This involves referencing textual sources that underpin the subject matter and concepts depicted within these works, while also scrutinizing the visual components to uncover latent objectives concealed behind the visual narrative. These woven treasures, with the theme of famous stories and events in the Jewish religion, as well as figures of prophecy and sanctity, are a type of carpet weaving art of the Qajar community. In this research, the painted narratives and elements in the context of one of the examples of this type of weaving, namely the "Ghader-e Motlagh" carpet, are analyzed and explained from the perspective of the artistic lens of iconology. Investigating the images and the portrayal of symbolic and allegorical themes and concepts within artistic and visual compositions encapsulates a comprehensive, overarching description of this approach. This methodology strives to fathom images (icons) as entities transcending mere visual representation, striving to convey messages to the audience that surpass the surface. The "Ghader-e Motlagh" rug,, with the central theme of the sacrifice of Prophet Abraham, is one of the most important carpets in the tradition of Jewish carpet weaving. This rug is subject to an iconological analysis in this study. The question raised about the topic is what are verbal, narrative, and visual themes hidden in the narration of the sacrifice of Isaac. The research endeavor aims to unearth and comprehend the meanings and concealed strata of the narrative through an exploration of both formal dimensions (elements and motifs) and the intricate interplay between them. The findings of this research encompass a twofold significance. Firstly, they serve to reiterate the foundational moral tenets of the Judaic faith and Jewish identity. These tenets are presented in the form of theological systems, vividly depicted as symbolic imagery. Secondly, the study unveils the core message and intent of the narrative: prophecy, accentuating the religious, moral, and philosophical doctrine of "obedience and submission" to the divine through the rite of "sacrifice," which entails forsaking cherished possessions and desires. The concept of sacrifice stands as an ancient archetype, woven throughout history, religions, tribes, and cultures, often at the behest of deities and adherents. The research methodology is qualitative and developmental, employing a Descriptive-analytical approach. The data collection method is rooted in library research. Examining the "Ghader-e Motlagh" rug exposes a melange of icons, including motifs of sacrificial sons, humans, animals, and flora (Bidmanjoon and cypress tree), as well as inscriptions, architectural elements, and more. These components, harmoniously integrated, aid in the revelation of the intended hidden meanings. Especially within spiritual systems, these symbols embody a pursuit of perfection. This study resides within the realm of qualitative research, characterized by its descriptive-analytical nature, while its purpose assumes a developmental trajectory. Data collection relies on library resources. . Concurrently, the research constitutes a case study, with data analysis adopting the iconological or iconographic approach. The purpose of this research is to analyze and interpret the written and visual themes related to the topic of sacrifice in the studied carpet. Iconology, which is referred to as the science of image interpretation and explanation, is made up of two words "icon" which means image and "logos" which means knowledge. In fact, iconology is the study of the logos of words, ideas, discourses, or recognition of icons or images, or similarities (Metchell, 1986, 1). ). While its origins trace back to ancient Greece, with Philocentrasnus' Book of Icons and Akmarasnis' literary style adaptation (Mokhtarian, 1390, 110), ), this approach found a distinct footing in the 19th century AD (Nasri, 1397, 18). Over time, it was Warburg who developed iconology in the late 19th century in order to apply it to various subjects. He not only extended iconography to religioussubjects but also was able to apply the defining range of iconographic methods in order to provide knowledge and the cultural history of art in a comprehensive manner. This method was later called iconology (ibid.), and Panofsky, one of Warburg's most prominent students, was able to structure this method. Iconology is "not only the description of icons - like iconography - but also the interpretation of images and symbols by revealing the interpretive aspect" (Namvar Motlagh, 2013, 73). Panofsky's ethnographic approach, aiming to discern the cultural conceptions attached to images, illuminates unexplored facets of a culture and its worldview (Keshavarz Afshar & Samanian, 2016, 96). The icon's essence, poised between sign and subject, invites a deep cultural probe for an understanding of its intrinsic meanings, aligning with elements deeply embedded within culture.Ergo, iconology, as the science of interpreting and explicating icons or images, strives to unearth the inherent meanings encapsulated within artworks and discern their symbolic significance. Concurrently, this endeavor necessitates a familiarity with the symbolic horizon of the icons or images, grounded in their cultural underpinnings spanning mythology, religion, philosophy, and history (Dayeri & Ashuri, 2015, 21). The theoretical framework of iconology unfolds across three stages. Pre-iconography phase constitutes the initial tier of comprehension. This phase entails an examination and description of the artwork (in this study, the selected carpet) and its concrete and tangible significance.This level encompasses a combination of both the real and expressive dimensions of meaning. Describing a work of art at this level necessitates knowingan understanding of its historical conte, its method, and style resemblances to comparable works, as well as relevant phenomena and themes. This level operates on the premise that visual constituents within the image are fashioned under the influence of specific factors. The subsequent phase, iconographic analysis, delves into the exploration of the central and conventional meanings entrenched within the artistic creation. This stage mandates a grasp of specific themes and concepts, entailing familiarity with a wide spectrum of motifs. Referred to as iconographic analysis, this level of meaning embodies the interplay between artistic motifs and their compositional form to construct a secondary, conventional meaning (Panofsky, 2012, 103). The secondary meaning in the field of art is the meaning that a person achieves with the subject or at a higher level with their theme by establishing a mutual relationship between artistic motifs and the form of their composition (Panofsky, 1972, 6). Unlike the prior level, this mental facet encapsulates allegorical manifestations and cultural codes, acknowledged, condensed, and institutionalized within ethnic groups. The third and final stage entails the analysis of iconology or the content-driven meaning of an artwork, culminating in iconological interpretation. This phase demands a profound comprehension of the culture in which the work was conceived, encompassing its worldview, principles, values, religious tenets, cultural elements, social dynamics, and philosophical orientations. To engage in this level of interpretation, the analyst must grasp the historical journey of symbols and signs. This tier of meaning assumes an authorial essence, evolving through intuitive processes (Panofsky, 1972, 7-9). Crucially, the third level of interpretation amalgamates the preceding two stages, crafting a coherent and inseparable progression. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Keywords: Jew, Religion, Art, Rug, Sacrifice | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
آژند، یعقوب؛ نامورمطلق، بهمن و عرفانمنش، ساحل (1399). تحلیل معنا در قالیچه محرابی موجود در موزه متروپولیتن با روش آیکونولوژی، کیمیای هنر، شماره 27، 71- 85.
آشتیانی، جلالالدین (1386). تحقیقی در دین یهود، تهران: نگارش.
امیدی، ایوب؛ مشرف، مریم و اسماعیلپور، ابوالقاسم (1399). بررسی و تحلیل آیین قربانی کردن در فرهنگ عامه شهرستان ایوان از نظرِ نظریه پردازان فرهنگ، مطالعات فرهنگ-ارتباطات، شماره 52، 171- 199.
باغشیخی، آرزو؛ کامرانی، بهنام؛ نکویی، مجید و باغشیخی، میلاد (1399). مطالعه و شناختِ موردی جنبههای تصویرسازانه فرش کاشان (دوره صفوی و قاجار)، هنر و تمدن شرق، شماره 27، 39- 52.
تناولی، پرویز (1396). قالیچههای تصویری ایران، تهران: سروش.
خشکنابی، سیدرضا (1378). ادب و عرفان در قالی ایران، تهران: سروش.
دیّری، حسین و آشوری، محمدتقی (1395). بررسی کهنالگوی آب و کمانکشی در داستان رستم و اسفندیار از منظر آیکونولوژی، نامه هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی، شماره 17، 19- 36.
ضیمران، محمد (1393). مبانی فلسفی نقد و نظر در هنر، تهران: نقش جهانمهر.
طاهری، صدرالدین و مردانی، آیگین (1398). شمایلشناسی نقشمایه بزکوهی در سنگنگارههای جربت، پژوهشنامه خراسان، شماره 36، 115- 127.
عسگری، زهرا؛ قاسمزاده، سیدعلی و قافلهباشی، سیداسماعیل (1399). کهنالگوی قربانی در آیینهای مهرپرستی و زرتشتی با محوریت قربانی شدن گاو، فرهنگ و ادبیات عامه، شماره 31، 73- 95.
عوضپور، بهروز (1395). رسالهای در باب آیکونولوژی، تهران: کتابآرایی ایرانی.
قانی، افسانه و مهرابی، افسانه (1397). تحلیل معنای قالیچه تصویری بختیاری با روش آیکونولوژی پانوفسکی، هنرهای صناعی ایران، شماره 2، 95- 111.قانی، افسانه (1399). آیکونولوژی خشت فرشته در قالی خشتی چالشتر با روش اروین پانوفسکی، الهیات هنر، شماره 14، 82- 101.قانی، افسانه (1400). آیکونولوژی نقشمایه دست دلبر در قالی خشتی چالِشتُر، مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی، شماره 12، 103- 114.کتاب مقدس (تورات) (1364). تهران: ترجمه و نشر انجمن کلیمیان ایران.
لطیفی، عبدالحسین (1397). واکاوی مفهوم اطاعت در عهد عتیق، پژوهشنامه ادیان، شماره 24، 163- 181.
مختاریان، بهار (1390). اهمیت آیکونوگرافی و آیکونولوژی در دین پژوهی (آیکونولوژی یونس و ماهی)، نقدنامه هنر، شماره 1، 109- 123.
منصورزاده، یوسف و بهفروزی، مینو (1397). تحلیلی بر آیین قربانی میترا و نمادهای آن بر اساس آثار هنری، هنرهای زیبا، شماره 4، 51- 60.
نامورمطلق، بهمن (1390). پیشینهشناسی تحلیلی آیکونوگرافی از سزار ریپا تا امیل مال، نقدنامه هنر، شماره 1، 65- 81.
نماز علیزاده، سهیلا و موسویلر، اشرفالسادات (1398). آیکونولوژی نگاره لیلی و مجنون در سفال سلجوقی، باغ نظر، شماره 75، 47- 52.
هال، جیمز (1380). فرهنگ نگارهای نمادها در هنر شرق و غرب، ترجمه رقیه بهزادی، تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
References
Avery-Peck Alan J. (2003), The Doctrine of God, The Blackwell Companion to Judaism, Jacob Neusner and Alan J. Avery-Peck(ed), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 214-5.
Felton, A. (1983), Jewish carpet, woodbridge: The Antique Collector’s club.
Fishbane, M.(1988), “The Image of the Human and the Rights of the Individual in Jewish Tradition”, Human Rights and the World’s Religions, edited by Loroy S. Rouner, Universtiy of Notre Dame Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T., & Thomas, J. (1986), Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology, the university of Chicago press
Panofsky, E. (1955), Meaning in the Visual Arts, Dobleday Anchor Books, New York
Panofsky, E. (1972). Studies in Iconology. Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. Harper & Row. New York.
Panofsky, E. (2012). On the Problem of Describing and Interpreting Work of the Visual Arts. Critical Inquiry 38.3, The University of Chicago press,Translated by K,Lorenz and J. Elsner. 467-282
Straten, R. V. (1994).An Introduction to Iconography Symbols, Allusions and Meaning in the Visual Arts, New York: Abingdon.
Ahmadi, B. (2005). Truth and Beauty, Tehran: Center publication. (Text in Persian).
Armstrong, K. (2012). Theology from Abraham until now Judaism, Christianity and Islam, translated by Mohsen Sepehr, Tehran: Center Publication.
Asgari, Z., Qasimzadeh, S., Qafelebashi., S. (2019). Archetype of sacrifice in the Mithraism and Zoroastrianism Religion: A Focus on Sacrificing Cow, Colture and Folk Literature, (8) 31, 73-95. (Text in Persian).
Ashtiani, J.(2007). A Research in Jewish Religion, Tehran: Author Publication.(Text in Persian).
Awazpour, B. (2016). A Treatise on Iconology, Tehran: Irani Book Design publication.
Azhand, Y., Namvarmotlagh, B., Erfanmanesh S.(2019). Analysis of Meaning in the Niche Rug of the Metropolitan Museum by iconoloical methodKimiya-ye-Honar8(37), 71-85.(Text in Persian).
Bible, Torah, translated by the Iranian Klimian Society.
Clapperman, G. (1968). The history of the Jewish people, translated by Masoud Hemmati, Otsar Hatora Cultural Association, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Iran publication.
Deuteronomy (the last book of the Torah), chapters 4 and 5.
Dheymaran, M. (2013). Philosophical foundations of criticism and opinion in art. Tehran: Naqsh Jahan publication.(Text in Persian).
Diyeri, H. , Ashouri, M., (2015). Examining the ancient pattern of water and archery in the story of Rostam and Esfandiar from the perspective of iconology, Visual and Applied Arts Letter, vol. 17, pp. 19-36. (Text in Persian).
Exodus (Second Hebrew Bible), chapters 19 and 20.
Genesis (the first part of the Hebrew Bible), chapter 17
Hall, James. (2001). Pictorial Dictionary of Symbols in Eastern and Western Art, translated by Roghieh Behzadi, Tehran, Contemporary Culture publication.
Isaiah, chapter 1.
Jeremiah, chapter 11.
Keshavarzafshar., M, Samanian.,S. (2007). Iconological analysis of the image carpet of Mary (PBUH) and Christ (PBUH), Goljam, Volume 8, 91-106. (Text in Persian).
Latifi, A.,(2017). Analyzing the concept of obedience in the Old Testament, Research Journal of Religions, Vol. 24, 181-163.(Text in Persian).
Mansourzadeh, Y., Behfrozi., M.(2017). An analytical study on the sacrifice of Mithra and its symbols based on art relics Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 23(4), , 51-60.(Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2018.248604.665840 Mukhtarian, S. (2010). The importance of iconography and iconology in the study of religion (the iconology of Yunus and Mahi), Art Review, Vol. 1, 109-123.(Text in Persian).
Namaz Alizadeh, S., Mousavilar.,A. (2017). Analysis of the visual and conceptual patterns of Azadeh's death in Ancient Persia, Sassanid and Seljuk period based on Panofsky`s Iconology approach, Negreh, 13(48), 87-74.(Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2019.884 Namvarmotlagh, B, Eisvand,L. (2018). A Transtextual Study of Abraham’s Sacrifice: Rembrandt and Farshchian Paintings, ,Rsearch Journal of the Iranian Academy of Arts, 2(2), 101-120,(Text in Persian).
Namvarmotlagh, B., (1390). Analytical historiography of iconography from Cesar Ripa to Emile Mall, Art Review, No. 1, 65-81.(Text in Persian).
Nasri, A., (2017). Image and word: approaches to iconography, Tehran: Cheshmeh publication.(Text in Persian).
Oben, E. (1362). Iran and Mesopotamia, translated by Ali Asghar Saidi. Tehran, Zovar.
Omidi, A., Moshref.,M, Esmaeilpour, A., (2019). Investigating and Analyzing Sacrifice In Ivan Folklore, Based on Cultural Theorists, Culture-Communication Studies, 21(52),, 171-199.(Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2020.203853.2922 Qani, A. (2017). An Iconological Study of the Bakhtiari Pictorial Carpet by Panofsky, Journal of Iranian Handicrafts Studies, 2(1) , 111-95.(Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22052/1.2.95 Qani, A. (2017). Clay iconology of the angel in a more challenging clay carpet with the method of Erwin Panofsky, Theology of Art, vol. 14, 66-43.(Text in Persian). Qani, A. (2021). Iconology of motifs of the lovely hand in Chaleshtor clay carpet, Theoretical Foundations of Visual Arts, vol. 12, 113-104.(Text in Persian).
Taheri, S., Mardani., A., (2018). Iconology of the Bezkohi motif in Jerbat petroglyphs, Khorasan Research Journal, Vol. 36, 115-127.(Text in Persian).
URLs
URL2. https:// biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-interpretation/binding-sacrifice-isaac/
URL3.https://bukowskis.com/en/auctions/583/978-semi-antique-kashan-figural-part-silk-224-5-x, date access: 25/2/2014.
URL5.https://bukowskis.com/en/auctions/583/978-semi-antique-kashan-figural-part-silk-224-5-x-:15/5/2011.
URL6.https://bukowskis.com/en/auctions/583/978-semi-antique-kashan-figural-part-silk-224-5-x-:15/5/2011.
URL8. https://bukowskis.com/en/auctions/568/237-semi-antique-kerman-laver-figural-83-5-x-64-cm16/7/2019.
URL10. https://christies.com/lot/lot-a-pictorial-mohtasham-kashan: 6/7/2013
URL11.christies.com/lot/lot-a-pictorial-mohtasham-kashan-rug-8/9/2021
URL12.https://essiecarpets.com/product/ravar-kerman: 12/3/2018
URL15. https://en.wikirug.org/wiki/File:Kashan_Rug_4-Christies-WikiRug.jpg: 17/8/2012
URL17.https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/antique-rugs/persian-rugs/kerman-rugs/pictorial- persian:13/2/2014.
URL18. https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/antique-rugs/ persian-rugs /kashan-rugs/ antique-persian-kashan:14/10/2008.
URL19. https://1stdibs.com/furniture/rugs-carpets/area-rugs-carpets/small-blue-judaica-antique:26/5/2011 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 324 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 202 |
||
